Paper · 2011

COMPARING COSTS AND EFFICIENCIES OF DIFFERENT ALFALFA IRRIGATION SYSTEMS

Blake L. Sanden; Karen Klonsky; Dan Putnam; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Alfalfa production is basically a linear function of plant transpiration and stomatal conductance that drives carbon dioxide uptake to build plant carbohydrates and biomass. Cutting schedules, irrigation non-uniformity and poor scheduling can result in lost yield and water use efficiency. Improved uniformity and scheduling of pivot and subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) can result in significant yield and water use efficiency (tons hay/inch of water) increases, but the additional capital and operational costs of these systems can equal as much as 2 to 3 tons per acre additional yield over the cost of border strip/flood irrigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Improving pivot and subsurface drip irrigation uniformity and scheduling can increase alfalfa yield and water use efficiency.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Improved uniformity and scheduling of pivot and subsurface drip irrigation (SDI)e0
Outcome
yield and water use efficiencye0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Improved uniformity and scheduling of pivot and subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) can result in significant yield and water use efficiency (tons hay/inch of water) increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Additional pivot and subsurface drip irrigation costs can equal 2 to 3 tons per acre of yield relative to border strip or flood irrigation.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
additional capital and operational costse0
Value
2 to 3 tons per acree0
Comparator
border strip/flood irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the additional capital and operational costs of these systems can equal as much as 2 to 3 tons per acre additional yield over the cost of border strip/flood irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 25 positive, 8 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.