Paper · 2010

G×E Interaction Effects on Yield and Yield Components of Landraces and Improved Cassava Genotypes in the Savanna Regions of Nigeria

Ilona Paul

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

3 Abstract: Genetic enhancement of cassava aimed at increasing production and productivity through the provision of broad-based improved germplasm is a major goal for Cassava breeders. At IITA, Nigeria, eighteen varieties comprising twelve landraces and six broad-based and improved varieties were evaluated at four locations in 3 years in a randomized complete block design in four replicates to determine variability among cultivars for yield components and adaptation to different environments. Results showed fresh root yield was significantly correlated (P<0.001) with number of roots, harvest index, shoot weight and number of stands harvested. AMMI analysis partitioned main effects into genotypes, environments and G×E with all the components showing highly significant effects (P<0.001). Environment had the greatest effect (70.3%), G×E interaction (19.0%) and genotype(10.7%). AMMI1 and unadjusted means selected the same winner in nine out of twelve environments (75%), but differently in three environments. The GGE biplot (E and G×E interaction) delineated environments into three mega-environments. Cultivar 4(2)1425 (moderately yielding) was the most stable and specifically adapted to Zaria. ABBEY-IFE, ATU-IWO and 2ND-AGRIC though moderately yielding were highly tolerant to CMD, suggesting a rich resource within the germplasm that could be enhanced for further genetic improvement of the crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava fresh root yield correlated significantly with roots, harvest index, shoot weight, and stands harvested.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
fresh root yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“fresh root yield was significantly correlated (P<0.001) with number of roots, harvest index, shoot weight and number of stands harvested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–649 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype, environment, and genotype-by-environment terms had highly significant effects, with environment accounting for the largest share.

Outcome
main effectse0
Direction
greateste0
Value
70.3%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“AMMI analysis partitioned main effects into genotypes, environments and G×E with all the components showing highly significant effects (P<0.001). Environment had the greatest effect (70.3%), G×E interaction (19.0%) and genotype(10.7%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–886 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMMI1 and unadjusted means chose the same winner in nine of twelve environments.

Outcome
selected the same winnere0
Value
75%e0
Comparator
unadjusted meanse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“AMMI1 and unadjusted means selected the same winner in nine out of twelve environments (75%), but differently in three environments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1019 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GGE biplot divided the tested environments into three mega-environments.

Outcome
three mega-environmentse0
Value
three mega-environmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“The GGE biplot (E and G×E interaction) delineated environments into three mega-environments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar 4(2)1425 was most stable and specifically adapted to Zaria.

Material
Cultivar 4(2)1425e0
Outcome
most stable and specifically adaptede0
Setting
Zariae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cultivar 4(2)1425 (moderately yielding) was the most stable and specifically adapted to Zaria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1207 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABBEY-IFE, ATU-IWO, and 2ND-AGRIC were highly tolerant to CMD.

Material
ABBEY-IFE, ATU-IWO and 2ND-AGRICe0
Outcome
highly tolerant to CMDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“ABBEY-IFE, ATU-IWO and 2ND-AGRIC though moderately yielding were highly tolerant to CMD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1295 · show in text ↑