Paper · 2014

Effects of organic and mineral sources of nutrient on quality and quantity yields of forage barley

Ahmad Ghanbari; Ahmad Ghasemi; Baratali Fakheri; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

barley forage organic and in organic fertilizer Organic and mineral fertilizers influences on forage barley production are not well known in Sistan region. Field experiment was established in autumn 2012 in Sistan research station center to determine the organic and inorganic manure and mixture of them effect on quality and quantity yield barley (HordeumVulgare l.). Six treatments were tested in a complete block design: (A) mineral fertilizer (NKP) an optimal dose (according to the Iran fertilization guidelines), (B) sub fertilization (2/3 of the optimal dose), (C) sub fertilization (1/3 of the optimal dose), (D) animal manure 60 t h-1( an optimal dose), (E) 1/2 of animal manure plus 1/2 of mineral fertilizer and (F) control. The treatments have a significant effect on quality and quantity barley forage. When NKP-fertilization were non-limited (optimal dose) and 1/2 manure plus 1/2 NKP was applied, CP, fresh and dry matter forage have more yielded than those in treatment whit other of them. The sub fertilization (1/3, 2/3 of optimal dose and control) decrease the fresh and dry matter yields by 19400, 5560 and 26487 kg ha-1 respectively. In conclusion, optimal dose (A) and 1/2 of animal manure plus 1/2 of mineral fertilizer (E) provide effective means to conserve soil fertility and forage production in this study. Splitting of organic manure inputs in short term did not bring any benefits to soil properties or crop production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic and mineral nutrient sources had a significant effect on quality and quantity of forage barley.

Taxon
barley foragee1
Treatment
organic and mineral sources of nutrientt1
Outcome
quality and quantity barley foragee1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1

“The treatments have a significant effect on quality and quantity barley forage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–815 · show in text ↑
t1

“Effects of organic and mineral sources of nutrient on quality and quantity yields of forage barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full NKP fertilization at optimal dose gave higher CP, fresh and dry matter forage yields than the other treatments.

Taxon
forage barleyt0
Treatment
NKP-fertilization were non-limited (optimal dose)e1
Outcome
CP, fresh and dry matter foragee1
Direction
have more yieldede1
Comparator
treatment whit other of theme1

Verbatim

e1

“When NKP-fertilization were non-limited (optimal dose) and 1/2 manure plus 1/2 NKP was applied, CP, fresh and dry matter forage have more yielded than those in treatment whit other of them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1004 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half manure plus half NKP gave higher CP, fresh and dry matter forage yields than the other treatments.

Taxon
forage barleyt0
Treatment
1/2 manure plus 1/2 NKPe1
Outcome
CP, fresh and dry matter foragee1
Direction
have more yieldede1
Comparator
treatment whit other of theme1

Verbatim

e1

“When NKP-fertilization were non-limited (optimal dose) and 1/2 manure plus 1/2 NKP was applied, CP, fresh and dry matter forage have more yielded than those in treatment whit other of them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1004 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal NKP dose and half manure plus half mineral fertilizer are effective means to conserve soil fertility and forage production.

Taxon
forage barleyt0
Outcome
conserve soil fertility and forage productione1

Verbatim

e1

“provide effective means to conserve soil fertility and forage production in this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Splitting organic manure inputs in the short term brought no benefit to soil properties or crop production.

Taxon
forage barleyt0
Treatment
Splitting of organic manure inputse1
Outcome
soil properties or crop productione1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1

“Splitting of organic manure inputs in short term did not bring any benefits to soil properties or crop production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1448 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

165 papers: 138 positive, 27 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

161 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this paper · 473 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.