Paper · 2006

Solanum tuberosum (L.) Responses to Soil Solarization and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Inoculation under Field Conditions: Growth, Yield, Health Status of Plants and Tubers

Albert Ngakou; Megueni Clautilde; D. Nwaga; et al.

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The influence of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) and disinfestation of soil with solar radiations (Solar) were tested in the field on potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) production, the health of plants and harvested tubers at Ngaoundere in the Guinea-savannah zone of Cameroon. Experiments were carried out in a complete randomized block design with four treatments in 2004 and eight in 2005. Non-AMF plants had poorest growth in terms of size and nodes production, while AMF plants grown on solarized soils had the greatest overall growth. The mycorrhizal inoculation ranged from 60 to 74 % in inoculated plants, indicating that Solanum tuberosum was moderately to highly mycorrhizal dependent. Yield of potato expressed in t ha was non- 1 significantly increased by AMF the first year, but was significantly increased by solarization and AMF the second year when compared to the control. Solarization and AMF showed their potential to reduce the diseased plants and tubers. Solar disinfestation of soil for one month was enough to improve potato yield when associated to AMF inoculation. These results suggest that combining soil solarization and AMF could be considered as a remediation of agricultural soils from biopollutants for smallholder farmers wishing to save N and P fertilizers to grow potato and earn cash.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants without AMF had the poorest size and node production.

Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
size and nodes productione0
Direction
pooreste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Non-AMF plants had poorest growth in terms of size and nodes production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–462 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF plants on solarized soil had greatest overall growth.

Treatment
AMF plants grown on solarized soilse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
overall growthe0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF plants grown on solarized soils had the greatest overall growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–537 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–166 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF colonization in inoculated potato ranged from 60 to 74%.

Interactor
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungie2symbiont
Outcome
mycorrhizal inoculatione0
Value
60 to 74 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mycorrhizal inoculation ranged from 60 to 74 % in inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–610 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF increased potato yield nonsignificantly in the first year.

Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbionte1
Outcome
Yield of potatoe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
the first yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield of potato expressed in t ha was non- 1 significantly increased by AMF the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–784 · show in text ↑
e1

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Solarization and AMF significantly increased potato yield in the second year relative to control.

Treatment
solarization and AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbionte2
Outcome
Yield of potatoe1
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
the second yeare0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly increased by solarization and AMF the second year when compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–886 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield of potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–709 · show in text ↑
e2

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solarization and AMF showed potential to reduce diseased plants and tubers.

Treatment
Solarization and AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbionte2
Outcome
diseased plants and tuberse0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solarization and AMF showed their potential to reduce the diseased plants and tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–972 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One month of solarization with AMF inoculation improved potato yield.

Treatment
Solar disinfestation of soil for one monthe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbionte1
Outcome
potato yielde0
Direction
improvee0
Qualifier
when associated to AMF inoculatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solar disinfestation of soil for one month was enough to improve potato yield when associated to AMF inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1086 · show in text ↑
e1

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–51 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest combining solarization and AMF as soil remediation for smallholder potato production.

Interactor
AMFe0symbionte1
Outcome
combining soil solarization and AMF could be considered as a remediation of agricultural soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combining soil solarization and AMF could be considered as a remediation of agricultural soils from biopollutants for smallholder farmers wishing to save N and P fertilizers to grow potato and earn cash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1317 · show in text ↑
e1

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–51 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

solarization · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

solarization · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.