Abstract
The present study was designed to study the effect of different transplanting methods in comparison with the farmer’s conventional transplanting methods at farmer’s field. Experiments were laid out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) and replicated thrice having a net plot size of 30 m x 40 m. The studies were carried out consecutively for three years during kharif season 2003, 2004 and 2005. For this study fifteen(15) locations viz; Sheikhupura (Mallian Kalan), Nankana Sahib (Warburten), Lahore (Burki), Wazirabad (Manzoorbad), Wazirabad (Rakh Bharokae), Kamonke (Ramey Farm), Noshehra Virkan, Daska, Pindi Bhattian (Sokhakea), Hafizabad (Ahmadpur Chatha), Pasroor (Poorib Klair), Gujranwala (Batala farm), Norowal (Burj). Shakar Garh (Tittarpur) and Ferozwala (Khori) were selected. The highest paddy yield (6.02 t ha) was produced by standard line transplanting at Nankana sahib which was statistically at par with that recorded in the same treatment at Sheikhupura and Gujranwala sites. The lowest paddy yield (3.3 t ha) was recorded in the treatment where nursery was randomly transplanted by the farmer in Kamoke tehsil. Data averaged across locations and years showed the highest paddy yield of 5.07 t hawere produced by the standard line transplanting which remained significantly different from both the other treatments (open & framer’s transplanting). The second highest value of paddy yield (4.33 t/ha) was produced by open transplanting treatment whereas farmer’s practice of random transplanting showed lowest paddy yield of 3.97 t/ha.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Standard line transplanting gave the highest paddy yield, 6.02 t ha, at Nankana sahib.
Verbatim
e1“The highest paddy yield (6.02 t ha) was produced by standard line transplanting at Nankana sahib”
e2“The present study was designed to study the effect of different transplanting methods in comparison with the farmer’s conventional transplanting methods at farmer’s field”
Claim · model-written summary
Averaged across locations and years, standard line transplanting gave the highest paddy yield, 5.07 t ha, significantly different from the other treatments.
Verbatim
e1“Data averaged across locations and years showed the highest paddy yield of 5.07 t hawere produced by the standard line transplanting which remained significantly different from both the other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Open transplanting gave the second highest paddy yield, 4.33 t/ha.
- Taxon
- paddye1
- Treatment
- open transplanting treatmente1
- Outcome
- paddy yielde1
- Direction
- second higheste1
- Value
- 4.33 t/hae1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“The second highest value of paddy yield (4.33 t/ha) was produced by open transplanting treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Farmer practice of random transplanting gave the lowest paddy yield, 3.97 t/ha.
- Taxon
- paddye1
- Treatment
- farmer’s practice of random transplantinge1
- Outcome
- paddy yielde1
- Direction
- loweste1
- Value
- 3.97 t/hae1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“farmer’s practice of random transplanting showed lowest paddy yield of 3.97 t/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Random transplanting of the nursery by the farmer in Kamoke tehsil gave the lowest paddy yield, 3.3 t ha.
- Taxon
- paddye1
- Treatment
- nursery was randomly transplanted by the farmere1
- Outcome
- paddy yielde1
- Direction
- loweste1
- Value
- 3.3 t hae1
- Setting
- Kamoke tehsile1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“The lowest paddy yield (3.3 t ha) was recorded in the treatment where nursery was randomly transplanted by the farmer in Kamoke tehsil”
The same questions in other papers
transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
1,074 papers more in this group
See all 1,078 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.