Paper · 1982 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Crucial time of weed removal in finger millet

Mahima Lall; L. N. Yadav

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Experiments conducted to identify the critical period of crop-weed competition in finger millet revealed that the period from 25 to 45 days after sowing was most crucial to provide weed free condition to the crop and dely in weed removal beyond 45 days after sowing resulted in decreased grain yields. Weeding operations done earlier than 25 days after sowing affected the crop yields adversely and the weed free conditions extended beyond 45 days after lowing did not give any additional advantage. Instead repeated weedings done to provide weed free conditions for the longer duration caused adverse effect on grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free conditions from days 25 to 45 were the crucial window.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Interactor
weedt0weed
Outcome
provide weed free condition to the crope0
Value
25 to 45 days after sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“period from 25 to 45 days after sowing was most crucial to provide weed free condition to the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–212 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed removal in finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing weeds after day 45 decreased grain yield.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
dely in weed removal beyond 45 days after sowinge0
Interactor
weedt0weed
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dely in weed removal beyond 45 days after sowing resulted in decreased grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–300 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed removal in finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeding before day 25 harmed crop yield.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Weeding operations done earlier than 25 days after sowinge0
Interactor
weedt0weed
Outcome
crop yieldse0
Direction
adverselye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weeding operations done earlier than 25 days after sowing affected the crop yields adversely”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–394 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed removal in finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extending weed-free conditions beyond day 45 gave no additional advantage.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
weed free conditions extended beyond 45 days after lowinge0
Interactor
weedt0weed
Outcome
additional advantagee0
Direction
did not givee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed free conditions extended beyond 45 days after lowing did not give any additional advantage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–498 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed removal in finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated weeding over a longer duration harmed grain yield.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
repeated weedingse0
Interactor
weedt0weed
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
adverse effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“repeated weedings done to provide weed free conditions for the longer duration caused adverse effect on grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–623 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed removal in finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–45 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 43 positive, 1 negative or no effect

43 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.