Paper · 2015

Implementing of RCPs scenarios to estimate the population density of parlatoria date scale insect, Parlatoria blanchardii (Targioni-Tozzetti) (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) infesting date palm trees in Luxor Governorate, Egypt

Moustafa M.S. Bakry; M. Abdrabbo; G. H. Mohamed

12
claims
31
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present work was carried out to study the effect of some climatic factors on the population density of the white date palm scale insect, Parlatoria blanchardii on date palm trees during three time series (2011-2040, 2041-2070 and 2071-2100) under four Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios (2.6, 4.5, 6.0 and 8.5) as compared with the current population of the pest (average of population density from 2009 to 2013 years) at Esna district, Luxor Governorate, Egypt. Results showed that monthly observations of total population of P. blanchardii had three to four peaks of seasonal activity per year. The mean minimum temperature was the most effective variable in population changes by 18.9, 20.9 and 19.9% for nymphs, adult females and total population of P. blanchardii during the base year data, respectively. The obtained results revealed the all expected values for number of nymphs, adult females and total population of insect during the all different time series under all different RCPs scenarios were smaller in comparison to the current population of insect. Expected total population of insect will be smaller at time series of (2071-2100) as compared with the two time series of (2041-2070) and (2011-2040) under the scenarios of (RCP 4.5, RCP 6 and RCP 8.5). Also, the time series of (2071-2100) exhibited the highest percentage of decreasing of the number of nymphs, adult females and total population with an average of (25.84, 23.76 and 24.91%) as compared to the time series of 2040-2071 (24.68, 22.44 and 23.68%) and the time series of 2011-2040 (10.43, 10.17 and 10.31%), respectively. Furthermore, the RCP 8.5 scenario exhibit the highest population density of nymphs, adult females and total population P. blanchardii and the lowest decreasing percentage of population density of P. blanchardii as compared with the different RCPs during all different time series.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scale insect populations had three to four seasonal peaks annually.

Taxon
date palm treesPhoenix dactyliferat0
Interactor
P. blanchardiie0pest
Outcome
total population of P. blanchardiie0
Value
three to four peakse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“monthly observations of total population of P. blanchardii had three to four peaks of seasonal activity per year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–617 · show in text ↑
t0

“date palm trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–192 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean minimum temperature explained 18.9% of nymph population changes.

Taxon
date palm treesPhoenix dactyliferat0
Interactor
P. blanchardiie0pest
Outcome
population changese0
Value
18.9e0
Setting
base year datae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean minimum temperature was the most effective variable in population changes by 18.9, 20.9 and 19.9% for nymphs, adult females and total population of P. blanchardii during the base year data, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“date palm trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–192 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean minimum temperature explained 20.9% of adult female population changes.

Taxon
date palm treesPhoenix dactyliferat0
Interactor
P. blanchardiie0pest
Outcome
population changese0
Value
20.9e0
Setting
base year datae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean minimum temperature was the most effective variable in population changes by 18.9, 20.9 and 19.9% for nymphs, adult females and total population of P. blanchardii during the base year data, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“date palm trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–192 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean minimum temperature explained 19.9% of total scale population changes.

Taxon
date palm treesPhoenix dactyliferat0
Interactor
P. blanchardiie0pest
Outcome
population changese0
Value
19.9%e0
Setting
base year datae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean minimum temperature was the most effective variable in population changes by 18.9, 20.9 and 19.9% for nymphs, adult females and total population of P. blanchardii during the base year data, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“date palm trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–192 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Projected nymph numbers were below current population under all time series and RCP scenarios.

Taxon
date palm treesPhoenix dactyliferat0
Interactor
Parlatoria blanchardiit1pest
Outcome
number of nymphse0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
current population of insecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all expected values for number of nymphs, adult females and total population of insect during the all different time series under all different RCPs scenarios were smaller in comparison to the current population of insect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1087 · show in text ↑
t0

“date palm trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–192 · show in text ↑
t1

“Parlatoria blanchardii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Projected adult female numbers were below current population under all time series and RCP scenarios.

Taxon
date palm treesPhoenix dactyliferat0
Interactor
Parlatoria blanchardiit1pest
Outcome
adult femalese0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
current population of insecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all expected values for number of nymphs, adult females and total population of insect during the all different time series under all different RCPs scenarios were smaller in comparison to the current population of insect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1087 · show in text ↑
t0

“date palm trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–192 · show in text ↑
t1

“Parlatoria blanchardii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Projected total scale numbers were below current population under all time series and RCP scenarios.

Taxon
date palm treesPhoenix dactyliferat0
Interactor
Parlatoria blanchardiit1pest
Outcome
total population of insecte0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
current population of insecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all expected values for number of nymphs, adult females and total population of insect during the all different time series under all different RCPs scenarios were smaller in comparison to the current population of insect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1087 · show in text ↑
t0

“date palm trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–192 · show in text ↑
t1

“Parlatoria blanchardii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Projected total scale population in 2071–2100 was smaller than in the two earlier periods under RCP 4.5, 6 and 8.5.

Taxon
date palm treesPhoenix dactyliferat0
Interactor
Parlatoria blanchardiit1pest
Outcome
total population of insecte0
Direction
smallere0
Qualifier
RCP 4.5, RCP 6 and RCP 8.5e0
Comparator
(2041-2070) and (2011-2040)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Expected total population of insect will be smaller at time series of (2071-2100) as compared with the two time series of (2041-2070) and (2011-2040) under the scenarios of (RCP 4.5, RCP 6 and RCP 8.5).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“date palm trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–192 · show in text ↑
t1

“Parlatoria blanchardii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Nymph population had greatest projected decrease in 2071–2100, averaging 25.84%.

Taxon
date palm treesPhoenix dactyliferat0
Interactor
Parlatoria blanchardiit1pest
Outcome
number of nymphse0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
25.84e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the time series of (2071-2100) exhibited the highest percentage of decreasing of the number of nymphs, adult females and total population with an average of (25.84, 23.76 and 24.91%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1480 · show in text ↑
t0

“date palm trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–192 · show in text ↑
t1

“Parlatoria blanchardii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Adult female population had greatest projected decrease in 2071–2100, averaging 23.76%.

Taxon
date palm treesPhoenix dactyliferat0
Interactor
Parlatoria blanchardiit1pest
Outcome
adult femalese0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
23.76e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the time series of (2071-2100) exhibited the highest percentage of decreasing of the number of nymphs, adult females and total population with an average of (25.84, 23.76 and 24.91%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1480 · show in text ↑
t0

“date palm trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–192 · show in text ↑
t1

“Parlatoria blanchardii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Total scale population had greatest projected decrease in 2071–2100, averaging 24.91%.

Taxon
date palm treesPhoenix dactyliferat0
Interactor
Parlatoria blanchardiit1pest
Outcome
total populatione0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
24.91%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the time series of (2071-2100) exhibited the highest percentage of decreasing of the number of nymphs, adult females and total population with an average of (25.84, 23.76 and 24.91%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1480 · show in text ↑
t0

“date palm trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–192 · show in text ↑
t1

“Parlatoria blanchardii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

RCP 8.5 yielded the highest projected scale population and lowest percentage decrease among scenarios.

Taxon
date palm treesPhoenix dactyliferat0
Interactor
P. blanchardiie0pest
Outcome
population density of P. blanchardiie0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
different RCPse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the RCP 8.5 scenario exhibit the highest population density of nymphs, adult females and total population P. blanchardii and the lowest decreasing percentage of population density of P. blanchardii as compared with the different RCPs during all different time series.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1638–1905 · show in text ↑
t0

“date palm trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–192 · show in text ↑