Paper · 1989 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Residual Effect of Herbicides in Irrigated Groundnut (Archis hypogaea)

S SELVAMANI; S. Sankakan

4
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Experiments were carried out to study the residual effect of herbicides applied in groundnut on the succeeding crops. Application of imazethapyr more than 75 g/ha affected test crops I ike cotton and sorghum when sown imnidiately after the harvest of groundnut. Residual effect had reciprocal relationship with time interval between harvest of groundnut and sowing of succeeding crops. Under hot and dry weather conditions, the residual effect was not observed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr above 75 g/ha applied in groundnut affected cotton sown immediately after groundnut harvest.

Treatment
imazethapyr more than 75 g/hae0
Outcome
affected test crops I ike cottone0

Not reportedComparatorSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of imazethapyr more than 75 g/ha affected test crops I ike cotton and sorghum when sown imnidiately after the harvest of groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr above 75 g/ha applied in groundnut affected sorghum sown immediately after harvest.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
imazethapyr more than 75 g/hae0
Outcome
affected test crops I ike cotton and sorghume0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of imazethapyr more than 75 g/ha affected test crops I ike cotton and sorghum when sown imnidiately after the harvest of groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–260 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual herbicide effect declined as the interval between groundnut harvest and succeeding crop sowing increased.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Outcome
Residual effecte0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Comparator
time interval between harvest of groundnut and sowing of succeeding cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residual effect had reciprocal relationship with time interval between harvest of groundnut and sowing of succeeding crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–384 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No residual effect was observed under hot and dry weather.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Outcome
residual effect was not observede0
Qualifier
hot and dry weather conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under hot and dry weather conditions, the residual effect was not observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–52 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.