Abstract
Among thirteen intercrops tried with brinjal intercropped with cluster bean (4:1) was cost effective which recorded the lowest shoot damage (115%) and fruit damage on number and weight basis by Leucinodes orbonalis (17.0 & 17.3%, respectively) and the lowest mean population of Coccidohystrix insolitus (41 nos/3 leaves) and Aphis gossypii (26.6 nos/3 leaves). No incidence of Henosepilachna vigintioctopunctata, Myllocerus spp., Amarasca devastans and Bemisia tabaci was noticed in brinjal intercropped with cluster bean. The population of natural enemies, coccinellids, syrphids and spiders were high in brinjal intercropped with cluster bean, recording 4.3, 3.1 and 1.9 nos/plant, as compared to brinjal as a pure crop. The highest cost benefit ratio of 1:2.70 was recorded in brinjal + cluster bean intercropping system while it was 1:1.62 in brinjal, as a pure crop.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Cluster-bean intercropping had the lowest brinjal shoot damage.
- Taxon
- brinjal
Solanum melongenae0 - Treatment
- intercropped with cluster bean (4:1)e0
- Outcome
- shoot damagee0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 115%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“brinjal intercropped with cluster bean (4:1) was cost effective which recorded the lowest shoot damage (115%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Cluster-bean intercropping had the lowest fruit damage by Leucinodes orbonalis on a number basis.
- Interactor
- Leucinodes orbonalis
Leucinodes orbonalise0pest - Outcome
- fruit damage on numbere0
- Value
- 17.0e0
Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit damage on number and weight basis by Leucinodes orbonalis (17.0 & 17.3%, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Cluster-bean intercropping had the lowest fruit damage by Leucinodes orbonalis on a weight basis.
- Interactor
- Leucinodes orbonalisLeucinodes orbonalise0pest
- Outcome
- fruit damage on number and weight basise0
- Value
- 17.3%e0
Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit damage on number and weight basis by Leucinodes orbonalis (17.0 & 17.3%, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Coccidohystrix insolitus was least abundant with cluster-bean intercropping.
- Interactor
- Coccidohystrix insolituse0pest
- Outcome
- population of Coccidohystrix insolituse0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 41 nos/3 leavese0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“the lowest mean population of Coccidohystrix insolitus (41 nos/3 leaves)”
Claim · model-written summary
Aphis gossypii was least abundant with cluster-bean intercropping.
- Interactor
- Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypiie0pest - Outcome
- Aphis gossypiie0
- Value
- 26.6 nos/3 leavese0
Not reportedTaxon
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Aphis gossypii (26.6 nos/3 leaves)”
Claim · model-written summary
Four named pests were absent from brinjal intercropped with cluster bean.
- Taxon
- brinjalSolanum melongenae0
- Treatment
- intercropped with cluster beane0
- Interactor
- Henosepilachna vigintioctopunctata
Henosepilachna vigintioctopunctatae0pest - Outcome
- No incidencee0
- Qualifier
- Myllocerus spp., Amarasca devastans and Bemisia tabacie0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“No incidence of Henosepilachna vigintioctopunctata, Myllocerus spp., Amarasca devastans and Bemisia tabaci was noticed in brinjal intercropped with cluster bean.”
Claim · model-written summary
Coccinellids were abundant in the brinjal and cluster-bean intercrop.
- Taxon
- brinjalSolanum melongenae0
- Interactor
- coccinellidse0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- coccinellidse0
- Direction
- highe0
- Value
- 4.3e0
- Comparator
- brinjal as a pure crope0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The population of natural enemies, coccinellids, syrphids and spiders were high in brinjal intercropped with cluster bean, recording 4.3, 3.1 and 1.9 nos/plant, as compared to brinjal as a pure crop.”
Claim · model-written summary
Syrphids were abundant in the brinjal and cluster-bean intercrop.
- Taxon
- brinjalSolanum melongenae0
- Interactor
- syrphidse0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- syrphidse0
- Direction
- highe0
- Value
- 3.1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The population of natural enemies, coccinellids, syrphids and spiders were high in brinjal intercropped with cluster bean, recording 4.3, 3.1 and 1.9 nos/plant, as compared to brinjal as a pure crop.”
Claim · model-written summary
Spiders were abundant in the brinjal and cluster-bean intercrop.
- Taxon
- brinjalSolanum melongenae0
- Outcome
- spiderse0
- Direction
- highe0
- Value
- 1.9 nos/plante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The population of natural enemies, coccinellids, syrphids and spiders were high in brinjal intercropped with cluster bean, recording 4.3, 3.1 and 1.9 nos/plant, as compared to brinjal as a pure crop.”
Claim · model-written summary
Brinjal and cluster-bean intercropping had a cost-benefit ratio of 1:2.70 versus 1:1.62 for brinjal alone.
- Taxon
- brinjalSolanum melongenae0
- Treatment
- brinjal + cluster bean intercropping systeme0
- Outcome
- cost benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1:2.70e0
- Qualifier
- 1:1.62e0
- Comparator
- brinjal, as a pure crope0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest cost benefit ratio of 1:2.70 was recorded in brinjal + cluster bean intercropping system while it was 1:1.62 in brinjal, as a pure crop.”
The same questions in other papers
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
intercropping · pest · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →intercropping · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.