Paper · 1972

Multiple-cut forage sorghum

R. C. Bunce

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In irrigated trials in 1968-70, bulrush millet cv. Tjolotjo Bearded and 15 sorghum-Sudan grass and Sudan grass hybrids were given 45-56 kg calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) + 56-78 kg single superphosphate + 34 kg muriate of potash/ha at sowing and were top-dressed with 56 kg CAN/ha after each cut (6 or 7). DM yields ranged from 16.3 to 22.3 t/ha in 1968-9 and from 10 to 16.6 t/ha in 1969-70. The highest yielding cv. also had the highest CP content, which ranged from 11.87 to 14.37% in 1968-9 and from 13.4 to 15.57% in 1969-70. The average period between cuts varied from 30 to 42 days in 1968-9 and from 28 to 32 days in 1969-70. Leaf percentage was 55-65%. The multiple-cut sorghum-Sudan grass and Sudan grass hybrids had no yield advantage over bulrush millet in single-season production, but produced DM yields of 3.9 to 6.1 t in the 2nd growing season, whereas bulrush millet did not survive the winter

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter yields ranged from 16.3 to 22.3 t/ha in 1968-9.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
DM yieldse0
Value
16.3 to 22.3 t/hae0
Qualifier
1968-9e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“DM yields ranged from 16.3 to 22.3 t/ha in 1968-9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–355 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter yields ranged from 10 to 16.6 t/ha in 1969-70.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
DM yieldse1
Value
10 to 16.6 t/hae0
Qualifier
1969-70e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“from 10 to 16.6 t/ha in 1969-70”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–391 · show in text ↑
e1

“DM yields ranged from 16.3 to 22.3 t/ha in 1968-9 and from 10 to 16.6 t/ha in 1969-70”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–391 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest yielding cultivar also had the highest crude protein content.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Material
cv.e0
Outcome
CP contente0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest yielding cv. also had the highest CP content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–449 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein content ranged from 11.87 to 14.37% in 1968-9.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
CP contente0
Value
11.87 to 14.37%e0
Qualifier
1968-9e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“CP content, which ranged from 11.87 to 14.37% in 1968-9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–494 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein content ranged from 13.4 to 15.57% in 1969-70.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
CP contente1
Value
13.4 to 15.57%e0
Qualifier
1969-70e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“from 13.4 to 15.57% in 1969-70”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–529 · show in text ↑
e1

“CP content, which ranged from 11.87 to 14.37% in 1968-9 and from 13.4 to 15.57% in 1969-70”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–529 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average period between cuts varied from 30 to 42 days in 1968-9.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
average period between cutse0
Value
30 to 42 dayse0
Qualifier
1968-9e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“The average period between cuts varied from 30 to 42 days in 1968-9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–598 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average period between cuts varied from 28 to 32 days in 1969-70.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
average period between cutse0
Value
28 to 32 dayse0
Qualifier
1969-70e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“The average period between cuts varied from 30 to 42 days in 1968-9 and from 28 to 32 days in 1969-70”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–632 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf percentage was 55-65%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
Leaf percentagee0
Value
55-65%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“Leaf percentage was 55-65%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multiple-cut hybrids had no yield advantage over bulrush millet in single-season production.

Taxon
sorghum-Sudan grass and Sudan grass hybridsSorghum ×drummondiie0
Treatment
multiple-cute0
Outcome
yield advantagee0
Direction
no yield advantagee0
Qualifier
single-season productione0
Comparator
bulrush millete0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The multiple-cut sorghum-Sudan grass and Sudan grass hybrids had no yield advantage over bulrush millet in single-season production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–793 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The hybrids produced 3.9 to 6.1 t of dry matter in the second season.

Taxon
sorghum-Sudan grass and Sudan grass hybridsSorghum ×drummondiie0
Outcome
DM yieldse0
Value
3.9 to 6.1 te0
Qualifier
2nd growing seasone0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sorghum-Sudan grass and Sudan grass hybrids had no yield advantage over bulrush millet in single-season production, but produced DM yields of 3.9 to 6.1 t in the 2nd growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–859 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulrush millet did not survive the winter.

Taxon
bulrush milletCenchrus americanuse0
Outcome
did not survive the wintere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bulrush millet did not survive the winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–910 · show in text ↑