Paper · 2015 · Ethnobotany Research and Applications

Ecological Apparency Hypothesis and Plant Utility in the Semiarid Region of Brazil

Natan Medeiros Guerra; Thamires Kelly Nunes Carvalho; João Everthon da Silva Ribeiro; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The ecological apparency hypothesis seeks to understand the dynamics of use that a particular species has through its availability in vegetation areas. According to this hypothesis, apparent plants are the most collected and used by humans. This hypothesis was tested in the rural community of Santa Rita, municipality of Congo, in Cariri microregion (Paraíba state, Northeast Brazil). We calculated the use value (UV) for each species. For the phytosociological inventory, we adopted the point-quadrant method, plotting 500 points distributed in the vegetation areas of the community, registering the perimeter measurements and height of 2000 plants. Interviews were conducted with householders, totaling 98 informants (41 men and 57 women), and 24 species, 21 genera, and 11 families were recorded. The cited species were grouped into 11 utility categories. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to correlate phytosociological and ethnobotanical data. The use values of the species did not correlate with phytosociological parameters. Regarding the use categories, there were positive correlations for fuel (UV with dominance and basal area), construction (UV with all phytosociological parameters), fodder (UV with all parameters), and poison/abortion categories (UV with density and frequency). Ecological apparency significantly explained the local importance of useful plants in fuel, construction, and fodder categories, and less significantly for poison/abortion.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The survey recorded 24 species, 21 genera, and 11 families.

Taxon
speciese0
Outcome
24 species, 21 genera, and 11 familiese0

Verbatim

e0

“24 species, 21 genera, and 11 families were recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–799 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cited species were grouped into 11 utility categories.

Taxon
speciese0
Outcome
11 utility categoriese0

Verbatim

e0

“The cited species were grouped into 11 utility categories”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–858 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Species use values did not correlate with phytosociological parameters overall.

Taxon
speciese0
Outcome
use valuese0
Direction
did not correlatee0
Comparator
phytosociological parameterse0

Verbatim

e0

“The use values of the species did not correlate with phytosociological parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1043 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fuel use value correlated positively with dominance and basal area.

Outcome
UVe0
Direction
positive correlationse0
Qualifier
fuele0
Comparator
dominance and basal areae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“positive correlations for fuel (UV with dominance and basal area)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1151 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Construction use value correlated positively with all phytosociological parameters.

Outcome
UVe0
Direction
positive correlationse0
Qualifier
constructione0
Comparator
all phytosociological parameterse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“positive correlations for fuel (UV with dominance and basal area), construction (UV with all phytosociological parameters)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1208 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fodder use value correlated positively with all parameters.

Outcome
UVe0
Direction
positive correlationse0
Qualifier
foddere0
Comparator
all parameterse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“positive correlations for fuel (UV with dominance and basal area), construction (UV with all phytosociological parameters), fodder (UV with all parameters)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1241 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poison and abortion use value correlated positively with density and frequency.

Outcome
UVe0
Direction
positive correlationse0
Qualifier
poison/abortion categoriese0
Comparator
density and frequencye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“positive correlations for fuel (UV with dominance and basal area), construction (UV with all phytosociological parameters), fodder (UV with all parameters), and poison/abortion categories (UV with density and frequency)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1305 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ecological apparency significantly explained local plant importance for fuel, construction, and fodder, and less significantly for poison or abortion.

Taxon
useful plantse0
Outcome
local importancee0
Qualifier
fuel, construction, and fodder categories, and less significantly for poison/abortione0
Comparator
Ecological apparencye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Ecological apparency significantly explained the local importance of useful plants in fuel, construction, and fodder categories, and less significantly for poison/abortion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1478 · show in text ↑