Paper · 2005 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Response of Weed Management Practices on the Growth and Yield of Urdbean { Vigna mungo L. Hepper}

R. Raman; G. Kuppuswamy; R. Krishnamoorthy

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field Investigation was carried out to evaluate the effect of hand weedings and herbicides on the weed flora, growth and yield of urdbean (Vigna mungo). The experiment was conducted in a randomised block design replicated four times with seven treatments viz., weedy check, one hand weeding on 20 DAS, two hand weedings on 20 and 40 DAS, f1uchloralin and pendimethalin each @ 0.5 and 1.0 kg/ha. All the weed control treatments significantly increased the growth and yield components and final yield of urdbean, attributable to reduced weed competition for nutrients, moisture, light and space. In respect of weed biomass and weed count, weedy check treatment recorded the highest value and twice hand weeding on 20 and 40 DAS gave the least value, followed by pendimethalin @ 1.0 kg/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control treatments increased urdbean growth and yield components.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungoe0
Treatment
weed control treatmentse0
Outcome
growth and yield componentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the weed control treatments significantly increased the growth and yield components and final yield of urdbean, attributable to reduced weed competition for nutrients, moisture, light and space.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control treatments increased final urdbean yield.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungoe0
Treatment
weed control treatmentse0
Outcome
final yield of urdbeane0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the weed control treatments significantly increased the growth and yield components and final yield of urdbean, attributable to reduced weed competition for nutrients, moisture, light and space.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–595 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weedy check had the highest weed biomass and count.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
weedy check treatmente0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomass and weed counte0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In respect of weed biomass and weed count, weedy check treatment recorded the highest value and twice hand weeding on 20 and 40 DAS gave the least value, followed by pendimethalin @ 1.0 kg/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urdbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DAS gave the lowest weed biomass and count.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
twice hand weeding on 20 and 40 DASe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomass and weed counte0
Direction
leaste0
Comparator
weedy check treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In respect of weed biomass and weed count, weedy check treatment recorded the highest value and twice hand weeding on 20 and 40 DAS gave the least value, followed by pendimethalin @ 1.0 kg/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urdbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin at 1.0 kg/ha ranked after twice hand weeding for low weed biomass and count.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
pendimethalin @ 1.0 kg/hae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomass and weed counte0
Direction
followed bye0
Comparator
twice hand weeding on 20 and 40 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In respect of weed biomass and weed count, weedy check treatment recorded the highest value and twice hand weeding on 20 and 40 DAS gave the least value, followed by pendimethalin @ 1.0 kg/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urdbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–72 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · weed · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

46 papers: 46 positive, 0 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

herbicide · weed · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 66 positive, 3 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

herbicide · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 89 positive, 6 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.