Paper · 2014 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Development of closed-type transplant production system and discussion of its application mode for flue-cured tobacco

Jiang HouLong; Li NaJia; Anding Xu; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To overcome difficulties in seedling breeding in low temperature ( the average temperature is 14.65 degreesC in March and April) areas and in areas receiving a low amount of sunlight (the average sunlight hour is 93.55 h in March and April), a closed-type transplant production system was designed and studied using flue-cured tobacco as the plant material. The system was used for breeding the tobacco seedlings and was compared with the floating system. The closed-type transplant production system shortened the breeding period, with the tobacco seedlings reaching the 5-leaf growth stage at approximately 25 d sooner than in the floating system. The stem diameter, dry weight of the roots, stems and leaves, root/shoot ratio, and rate of healthy seedlings were higher by 35%, 160%, 49%, 8%, 74%, and 84%, respectively, in the closed-type system than in the floating system. The costs of seedling breeding in the closed-type system with and without heeling-in (direct planting) were reduced by 70% and 21%, respectively, compared with the floating system. Our results showed that the closed-type transplant production system effectively mitigated the problems of long seedling age and low rate of healthy seedlings in low temperature areas and in areas receiving a low amount of sunlight without lowering the agronomic qualities of seedlings. Furthermore, this closed-type transplant system reduced the consumption of wetland peat, which is a non-renewable resource, thereby significantly reducing the cost of seedling breeding. This system can potentially solve transplant crop production problems encountered in low temperature areas and in areas receiving a low amount of sunlight in China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The closed system reached the five-leaf stage about 25 days earlier.

Treatment
closed-type transplant production systemt0
Outcome
5-leaf growth stagee0
Direction
soonere0
Value
approximately 25 de0
Comparator
floating systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tobacco seedlings reaching the 5-leaf growth stage at approximately 25 d sooner than in the floating system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–648 · show in text ↑
t0

“closed-type transplant production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem diameter was 35% higher in the closed system.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
closed-type systeme0
Outcome
stem diametere0
Direction
highere0
Value
35%e0
Comparator
floating systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“The stem diameter, dry weight of the roots, stems and leaves, root/shoot ratio, and rate of healthy seedlings were higher by 35%, 160%, 49%, 8%, 74%, and 84%, respectively, in the closed-type system than in the floating system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root dry weight was 160% higher.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
closed-type systeme0
Outcome
dry weight of the rootse0
Direction
highere0
Value
160%e0
Comparator
floating systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“The stem diameter, dry weight of the roots, stems and leaves, root/shoot ratio, and rate of healthy seedlings were higher by 35%, 160%, 49%, 8%, 74%, and 84%, respectively, in the closed-type system than in the floating system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem dry weight was 49% higher.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
closed-type systeme0
Outcome
dry weight of the roots, stems and leavese0
Direction
highere0
Value
49%e0
Comparator
floating systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“The stem diameter, dry weight of the roots, stems and leaves, root/shoot ratio, and rate of healthy seedlings were higher by 35%, 160%, 49%, 8%, 74%, and 84%, respectively, in the closed-type system than in the floating system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf dry weight was 8% higher.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
closed-type systeme0
Outcome
dry weight of the roots, stems and leavese0
Direction
highere0
Value
8%e0
Comparator
floating systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“The stem diameter, dry weight of the roots, stems and leaves, root/shoot ratio, and rate of healthy seedlings were higher by 35%, 160%, 49%, 8%, 74%, and 84%, respectively, in the closed-type system than in the floating system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-to-shoot ratio was 74% higher.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
closed-type systeme0
Outcome
root/shoot ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
74%e0
Comparator
floating systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“The stem diameter, dry weight of the roots, stems and leaves, root/shoot ratio, and rate of healthy seedlings were higher by 35%, 160%, 49%, 8%, 74%, and 84%, respectively, in the closed-type system than in the floating system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Healthy-seedling rate was 84% higher.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
closed-type systeme0
Outcome
rate of healthy seedlingse0
Direction
highere0
Value
84%e0
Comparator
floating systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“The stem diameter, dry weight of the roots, stems and leaves, root/shoot ratio, and rate of healthy seedlings were higher by 35%, 160%, 49%, 8%, 74%, and 84%, respectively, in the closed-type system than in the floating system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling costs with heeling-in fell 70%.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
closed-type system with and without heeling-in (direct planting)e0
Outcome
costs of seedling breedinge0
Direction
reducede0
Value
70%e0
Qualifier
with and without heeling-in (direct planting)e0
Comparator
floating systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“costs of seedling breeding in the closed-type system with and without heeling-in (direct planting) were reduced by 70% and 21%, respectively, compared with the floating system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1057 · show in text ↑
t0

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling costs without heeling-in fell 21%.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
closed-type system with and without heeling-in (direct planting)e0
Outcome
costs of seedling breedinge0
Direction
reducede0
Value
21%e0
Qualifier
with and without heeling-in (direct planting)e0
Comparator
floating systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“costs of seedling breeding in the closed-type system with and without heeling-in (direct planting) were reduced by 70% and 21%, respectively, compared with the floating system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1057 · show in text ↑
t0

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The closed system reduced wetland peat consumption.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
closed-type transplant systeme0
Outcome
consumption of wetland peate0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“this closed-type transplant system reduced the consumption of wetland peat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1433 · show in text ↑
t0

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–117 · show in text ↑

transplanting · pest · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

transplanting · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.