Paper · 2015 · Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences)

Effect of plant density and row spacing on maize grain yield on calcareous chernozem soil

Eszter Murányi

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Nowadays the aim of crop production is to realize the highest possible yield per production area unit by the highest possible crop safety. One of the possible ways for this is to increase of plant density or to decrease row spacing. Therefore, the plant number per unit area can be increased and the potential yield loss of individual plants is compensated by the higher plant density. The development of yield amounts of eight different genotypes was investigated in a small-plot field experiment with four replications on a calcareous chernozem soil type at the Látókép Research Site of the University of Debrecen in the crop years 2013 and 2014. Row distances of 45 and 76 cm, just as plant densities of 50 000, 70 000 and 90 000 plants per ha were set. Significant differences were found between the yield amounts of the studied hybrids in both studied crop years, while the effect of plant density on yield amount showed different results. In the crop year of 2013 the hybrids resulted high yields in the treatment with a row distance of 45 cm and plant density of 90 000 plants per ha, however, in 2014 significant yield decrease was found in comparison with the previous year, that can be attributed to the weather conditions in the months April-May and June. Optimal plant densities of hybrids, just as the corresponding expectable yield amounts were determined with quadratic equations. Optimal plant densities of the hybrids were different in the two studied crop years: in 2013, regarding the treatments set with the row distance of 45 cm, increasing plant densities resulted in higher yields, while in 2014, the yield showed decreasing tendency parallel to the increasing plant densities, that is confirmed by the fact that plant densities of 50 000 and 65 000 plants ha -1 proved to be more favourable. Regarding the treatments with a row distance of 76 cm, hybrids obtained their yield maximums by 80 327 plants ha -1 in 2013, while in the vegetation of 2014, by higher plant density (85 845 plants ha -1)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize hybrids differed significantly in yield in both study years.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
studied hybridse0
Outcome
yield amountse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant differences were found between the yield amounts of the studied hybrids in both studied crop years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–867 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2013, hybrids yielded highly at 45 cm row spacing and 90 000 plants per ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
hybridse0
Treatment
row distance of 45 cm and plant density of 90 000 plants per hae0
Outcome
high yieldse0
Setting
2013e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the crop year of 2013 the hybrids resulted high yields in the treatment with a row distance of 45 cm and plant density of 90 000 plants per ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1090 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield in 2014 decreased significantly relative to 2013.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
previous yeare0
Setting
2014e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“in 2014 significant yield decrease was found in comparison with the previous year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 45 cm spacing, increasing plant density raised maize yield in 2013.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
increasing plant densitiese0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
row distance of 45 cme0
Setting
2013e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“in 2013, regarding the treatments set with the row distance of 45 cm, increasing plant densities resulted in higher yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 45 cm spacing, maize yield tended to decrease with increasing density in 2014.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
increasing plant densitiese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasing tendencye0
Setting
2014e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“in 2014, the yield showed decreasing tendency parallel to the increasing plant densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1611–1699 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 45 cm spacing in 2014, densities of 50 000 and 65 000 plants ha -1 were more favorable.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
more favourablee0
Direction
more favourablee0
Value
50 000 and 65 000 plants ha -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“plant densities of 50 000 and 65 000 plants ha -1 proved to be more favourable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1736–1814 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 76 cm row spacing, maize hybrids reached maximum yield at 80 327 plants ha -1 in 2013.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
yield maximumse0
Direction
maximumse0
Value
80 327 plants ha -1e0
Qualifier
row distance of 76 cme0
Setting
2013e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“Regarding the treatments with a row distance of 76 cm, hybrids obtained their yield maximums by 80 327 plants ha -1 in 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–1939 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 76 cm row spacing, maize hybrids reached maximum yield at 85 845 plants ha -1 in 2014.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
higher plant densitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
85 845 plants ha -1e0
Setting
2014e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“while in the vegetation of 2014, by higher plant density (85 845 plants ha -1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1941–2019 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

658 papers: 519 positive, 139 negative or no effect

518 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

654 papers more in this group

See all 658 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.