Paper · 2012 · Indian journal of plant protection

Characterization of Tilletia indica Isolates and Monosporidial Lines by Using Differential Hosts and RAPD Based PCR Markers

Shama Parveen; M. S. Saharan; Ambresh Kumar Verma; et al.

9
claims
27
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Karnal bunt of wheat ranks as one of the major disease of wheat causing quality losses and monetary losses due to international quarantine regulations. In the present investigation, genetic and pathological variation among the ten isolates and 15 monosporidial lines belonged to different locations of North West India was studied. Based on the pathogenic potential, the isolates were categorized into three distinct groups. Most virulent and least aggressive isolates were found KBR1 and KBHP3 scored co-efficient of infection of 70.98 and 6.22, respectively on susceptible variety HD 2009 under artificially inoculated conditions. Fifteen monosporidial lines were inoculated in 20 combinations. Most virulent compatible combination was found in KBH1Md X KBR1Ma, which resulted co-efficient of infection of 74.91. Genetic relationship among Tilletia indica isolates and monosporidial lines was studied by using 34 RAPD primers, which revealed 92.82% polymorphism. Similarity coefficient values ranged from 0.61 to 0.96 and the dendrogram developed by RAPD primers based analysis grouped the isolates and monosporidial lines into two groups. The self paired monosporidial lines raised from the same isolates caused less infection as well as magnitude of variation based on RAPD clustering was also narrow.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isolates were categorized into three groups by pathogenic potential.

Outcome
pathogenic potentiale0
Value
three distinct groupse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on the pathogenic potential, the isolates were categorized into three distinct groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–423 · show in text ↑
t0

“Differential Hosts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“Karnal bunt of wheat ranks as one of the major disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KBR1 was the most virulent isolate on susceptible wheat variety HD 2009, with infection coefficient 70.98.

Material
HD 2009e0
Interactor
KBR1e0pathogen
Outcome
co-efficient of infectione0
Direction
Most virulente0
Value
70.98e0
Qualifier
artificially inoculated conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most virulent and least aggressive isolates were found KBR1 and KBHP3 scored co-efficient of infection of 70.98 and 6.22, respectively on susceptible variety HD 2009 under artificially inoculated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Characterization of Tilletia indica Isolates and Monosporidial Lines by Using Differential Hosts and RAPD Based PCR Markers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Karnal bunt of wheat ranks as one of the major disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KBHP3 was the least aggressive isolate on susceptible wheat variety HD 2009, with infection coefficient 6.22.

Material
HD 2009e0
Interactor
KBHP3e0pathogen
Outcome
co-efficient of infectione0
Direction
least aggressivee0
Value
6.22e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most virulent and least aggressive isolates were found KBR1 and KBHP3 scored co-efficient of infection of 70.98 and 6.22, respectively on susceptible variety HD 2009 under artificially inoculated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Characterization of Tilletia indica Isolates and Monosporidial Lines by Using Differential Hosts and RAPD Based PCR Markers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Karnal bunt of wheat ranks as one of the major disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KBH1Md X KBR1Ma was the most virulent compatible pairing, with infection coefficient 74.91.

Interactor
KBH1Md X KBR1Mae0pathogen
Outcome
co-efficient of infectione0
Direction
Most virulente0
Value
74.91e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most virulent compatible combination was found in KBH1Md X KBR1Ma, which resulted co-efficient of infection of 74.91”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“Characterization of Tilletia indica Isolates and Monosporidial Lines by Using Differential Hosts and RAPD Based PCR Markers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Karnal bunt of wheat ranks as one of the major disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RAPD primers revealed 92.82% polymorphism among Tilletia indica isolates and monosporidial lines.

Interactor
Tilletia indicaTilletia indicae0pathogen
Outcome
polymorphisme0
Value
92.82%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tilletia indica
Tilletia indica · InteractorThis image was released by the Agricultural Research Service , the research agency of the United States Department of Agriculture , with the ID k8389-2 (next) . · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genetic relationship among Tilletia indica isolates and monosporidial lines was studied by using 34 RAPD primers, which revealed 92.82% polymorphism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“Characterization of Tilletia indica Isolates and Monosporidial Lines by Using Differential Hosts and RAPD Based PCR Markers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Karnal bunt of wheat ranks as one of the major disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Similarity coefficients ranged from 0.61 to 0.96.

Outcome
Similarity coefficient valuese0
Value
0.61 to 0.96e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarity coefficient values ranged from 0.61 to 0.96”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“Characterization of Tilletia indica Isolates and Monosporidial Lines by Using Differential Hosts and RAPD Based PCR Markers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Karnal bunt of wheat ranks as one of the major disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RAPD analysis grouped isolates and monosporidial lines into two groups.

Outcome
grouped the isolates and monosporidial lines into two groupse0
Value
two groupse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dendrogram developed by RAPD primers based analysis grouped the isolates and monosporidial lines into two groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Characterization of Tilletia indica Isolates and Monosporidial Lines by Using Differential Hosts and RAPD Based PCR Markers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Karnal bunt of wheat ranks as one of the major disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Self paired monosporidial lines caused less infection.

Interactor
monosporidial linese0pathogen
Outcome
infectione0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The self paired monosporidial lines raised from the same isolates caused less infection as well as magnitude of variation based on RAPD clustering was also narrow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“Characterization of Tilletia indica Isolates and Monosporidial Lines by Using Differential Hosts and RAPD Based PCR Markers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Karnal bunt of wheat ranks as one of the major disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Self paired monosporidial lines had narrow RAPD variation.

Interactor
monosporidial linese0pathogen
Outcome
magnitude of variation based on RAPD clusteringe0
Direction
narrowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The self paired monosporidial lines raised from the same isolates caused less infection as well as magnitude of variation based on RAPD clustering was also narrow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“Characterization of Tilletia indica Isolates and Monosporidial Lines by Using Differential Hosts and RAPD Based PCR Markers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Karnal bunt of wheat ranks as one of the major disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑