Paper · 2012 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Management of Bactrocera Cucurbitae Coq. Through Pheromone Traps and Bio-Rational Insecticides in Bitter Gourd

Santanu Mandal

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The treatments consisted the use of pheromones traps along with discarding of infested/damaged fruits at each harvest and sprays of biorational insecticides, like spinosad (Spinotar 45 SC 1 ml/2.5 L) and azadirachtin 0.15% (Achook @ 2 ml/L) in different combinations, these treatments were compared with the farmers’ practice of alternate sprays of endosulfan (Thiodan 35 EC @ 2 ml/L) followed by carbaryl (Sevin 50 WP @ 2 g/L) at 10 day interval, and an untreated control. The results revealed that the average mean percentage of fruit damage was the lowest in package of treatment such as installation of sex pheromone traps and spinosad spray along with discarding of infested/damaged fruits at each harvesting, resulting in the highest yield of marketable fruits (145.26 q/ha). But installation of sex pheromone trap alone treatment showed the highest C:B ratio of 1:13.27, which in other treatments varied between 1:1.59 and 1:7.71, whereas, in farmer’s practice the increased in yield over control as a result of insecticidal sprays was the lowest C:B ratio of 1:1.59.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pheromone traps with discarding of infested fruit and spinosad sprays gave the lowest fruit damage by Bactrocera cucurbitae in bitter gourd.

Taxon
Bitter GourdMomordica charantiat0
Treatment
installation of sex pheromone traps and spinosad spray along with discarding of infested/damaged fruits at each harvestinge1
Interactor
Bactrocera CucurbitaeZeugodacus cucurbitaet0pest
Outcome
average mean percentage of fruit damagee1
Direction
loweste1
Comparator
untreated controle0

Not reportedSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Momordica charantia
Momordica charantia · TaxonMorenga01 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zeugodacus cucurbitae
Zeugodacus cucurbitae · InteractorFlorida Division of Plant Industry Archive, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of Bactrocera Cucurbitae Coq. Through Pheromone Traps and Bio-Rational Insecticides in Bitter Gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results revealed that the average mean percentage of fruit damage was the lowest in package of treatment such as installation of sex pheromone traps and spinosad spray along with discarding of infested/damaged fruits at each harvesting, resulting in the highest yield of marketable fruits (145.26 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–780 · show in text ↑
e0

“and an untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sex pheromone trap alone gave the highest C:B ratio of 1:13.27 in bitter gourd.

Taxon
Bitter GourdMomordica charantiat0
Treatment
installation of sex pheromone trap alonee2
Outcome
C:B ratioe2
Direction
higheste2
Value
1:13.27e2
Comparator
other treatmentse3

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Momordica charantia
Momordica charantia · TaxonMorenga01 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of Bactrocera Cucurbitae Coq. Through Pheromone Traps and Bio-Rational Insecticides in Bitter Gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e2

“installation of sex pheromone trap alone treatment showed the highest C:B ratio of 1:13.27”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–876 · show in text ↑
e3

“which in other treatments varied between 1:1.59 and 1:7.71”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–936 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticidal sprays in the farmers practice gave the lowest C:B ratio of 1:1.59 in bitter gourd.

Taxon
Bitter GourdMomordica charantiat0
Treatment
insecticidal sprayse4
Outcome
C:B ratioe4
Direction
loweste4
Value
1:1.59e4
Comparator
controle4

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Momordica charantia
Momordica charantia · TaxonMorenga01 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of Bactrocera Cucurbitae Coq. Through Pheromone Traps and Bio-Rational Insecticides in Bitter Gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e4

“the increased in yield over control as a result of insecticidal sprays was the lowest C:B ratio of 1:1.59”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1073 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pheromone trap and spinosad package gave the highest yield of marketable bitter gourd fruits (145.26 q/ha).

Taxon
Bitter GourdMomordica charantiat0
Treatment
installation of sex pheromone traps and spinosad spray along with discarding of infested/damaged fruits at each harvestinge1
Outcome
yield of marketable fruitse1
Direction
higheste1
Value
145.26 q/hae1

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Momordica charantia
Momordica charantia · TaxonMorenga01 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of Bactrocera Cucurbitae Coq. Through Pheromone Traps and Bio-Rational Insecticides in Bitter Gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results revealed that the average mean percentage of fruit damage was the lowest in package of treatment such as installation of sex pheromone traps and spinosad spray along with discarding of infested/damaged fruits at each harvesting, resulting in the highest yield of marketable fruits (145.26 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–780 · show in text ↑

spinosad · Zeugodacus cucurbitae · Momordica charantia (bitter gourd)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

pheromone · Zeugodacus cucurbitae · Momordica charantia (bitter gourd)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

trap barrier · quality: postharvest · Momordica charantia (bitter gourd)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · Zeugodacus cucurbitae · Momordica charantia (bitter gourd)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

trap barrier · Zeugodacus cucurbitae · Momordica charantia (bitter gourd)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.