Paper · 2007 · Journal of Agricultural and Marine Sciences [JAMS]

Hemipteran Hopper Species Associated with Acid Lime Plants (Citrus aurantifolia L .) in the Sultanate of Oman: Candidate Vectors of Witches’-Broom Disease of Lime

Syed Ali Razvi; Rashid Al-Shidi; Najma Mahmood Al-Zadjali; et al.

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nd

Abstract

Regular monitoring of hemipteran hopper species (including psyllids) associated with small-fruited acid lime trees (Citrus aurantifolia L.) was conducted for four years using motorized insect suction to determine the possible vectors of witches’- broom disease of lime (WBDL). The study was done in two phases: monitoring was done in Habra village, Wilayat Wadi AlMaawal (Batinah region) for one year from June 2000 to May 2001; then monitoring was done in Maharah village, Wilayat AlMusannah (Batinah region), for a period of three years from May 2001 to April 2004. Twelve species of cicadellid leafhoppers and one delpahacid planthopper species were collected, while no psyllids were found. Hishimonus phycitis (Distant) (Cicadellidae) was the most abundant hopper (78.4 % of collected individuals). Next in abundance were Toya sp. (Delphacidae), Circulifera haematiceps? and a deltocephalin leafhopper, respectively constituting 10.4, 3.8 and 2.4 % of the total catches of the four years. Nine other species made up 5% of the total collection: Exitianus nanus (Distant), Cicadulina sp. (either chinai (Ghauri) or storeyi (China)), Emposca distinguenda (Paoli), Amrasca biguttula (Ishihara), Deltocephalus (Recilia) pruthii (Metcalf), Neolimnus aegyptiacus (Mutsumura) and three undetermined species (one Deltocephalinae, one Typhlocybinae and one undeterminable to subfamily). Catches of H. phycitis were highest from November to March and lowest from May to September. There was a significant linear relationship between number of H. phycitis and maximum and mininmum temperature. Relative humidity was not significantly correlated to number of H. phycitis. In Maharah, young lime trees were free from WBDL but the disease incidence increased with age. H. phycitis is the best candidate vector of WBDL. The potential of Toya sp., Circulifera haematiceps? and an undetermined deltocephalin as candidate vectors is discussed. Finally, it is suggested that regular sprayings of acid lime trees with effective systemic insecticides during November to March each year can greatly reduce the vector population and can prevent or delay the spread of the disease to a great extent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twelve leafhopper species and one planthopper were collected; no psyllids were found.

Taxon
Acid Lime Plantst0
Outcome
Twelve species of cicadellid leafhoppers and one delpahacid planthopper species were collected, while no psyllids were founde0

Verbatim

e0

“Twelve species of cicadellid leafhoppers and one delpahacid planthopper species were collected, while no psyllids were found.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“Acid Lime Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hishimonus phycitis was most abundant at 78.4% of individuals.

Taxon
Acid Lime Plantst0
Interactor
Hishimonus phycitisHishimonus phycitise0
Outcome
most abundant hoppere0
Value
78.4 %e0

Not reportedInteractor role

Verbatim

e0

“Hishimonus phycitis (Distant) (Cicadellidae) was the most abundant hopper (78.4 % of collected individuals).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–802 · show in text ↑
t0

“Acid Lime Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Toya sp. accounted for 10.4% of catches.

Taxon
Acid Lime Plantst0
Interactor
Toya sp.Toyae0
Outcome
total catches of the four yearse0

Not reportedInteractor roleValue

Verbatim

e0

“Next in abundance were Toya sp. (Delphacidae), Circulifera haematiceps? and a deltocephalin leafhopper, respectively constituting 10.4, 3.8 and 2.4 % of the total catches of the four years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“Acid Lime Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Circulifera haematiceps accounted for 3.8% of catches.

Taxon
Acid Lime Plantst0
Interactor
Circulifera haematiceps?e0
Outcome
total catches of the four yearse0

Not reportedInteractor roleValue

Verbatim

e0

“Next in abundance were Toya sp. (Delphacidae), Circulifera haematiceps? and a deltocephalin leafhopper, respectively constituting 10.4, 3.8 and 2.4 % of the total catches of the four years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“Acid Lime Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A deltocephalin leafhopper accounted for 2.4% of catches.

Taxon
Acid Lime Plantst0
Interactor
a deltocephalin leafhoppere0
Outcome
total catches of the four yearse0

Not reportedInteractor roleValue

Verbatim

e0

“Next in abundance were Toya sp. (Delphacidae), Circulifera haematiceps? and a deltocephalin leafhopper, respectively constituting 10.4, 3.8 and 2.4 % of the total catches of the four years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“Acid Lime Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nine other species comprised 5% of the collection.

Taxon
Acid Lime Plantst0
Outcome
total collectione0
Value
5%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Nine other species made up 5% of the total collection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“Acid Lime Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H. phycitis catches were highest November to March and lowest May to September.

Taxon
Acid Lime Plantst0
Interactor
H. phycitisHishimonus phycitise0
Outcome
Catches of H. phycitise0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedInteractor role

Verbatim

e0

“Catches of H. phycitis were highest from November to March and lowest from May to September.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Acid Lime Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

H. phycitis numbers had a significant linear relation with maximum and minimum temperature.

Taxon
Acid Lime Plantst0
Interactor
H. phycitisHishimonus phycitise0
Outcome
number of H. phycitise0

Not reportedInteractor roleDirection

Verbatim

e0

“There was a significant linear relationship between number of H. phycitis and maximum and mininmum temperature.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1585 · show in text ↑
t0

“Acid Lime Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative humidity did not correlate significantly with H. phycitis numbers.

Taxon
Acid Lime Plantst0
Interactor
H. phycitisHishimonus phycitise0
Outcome
number of H. phycitise0

Not reportedInteractor roleDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Relative humidity was not significantly correlated to number of H. phycitis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1586–1662 · show in text ↑
t0

“Acid Lime Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WBDL incidence rose with lime tree age in Maharah.

Organ / stage
younge0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Maharahe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x aurantiifolia
Citrus ×aurantiifolia · TaxonAyuwadala · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Maharah, young lime trees were free from WBDL but the disease incidence increased with age.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1757 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H. phycitis was the best candidate WBDL vector.

Taxon
Acid Lime Plantst0
Interactor
H. phycitisHishimonus phycitise0
Outcome
best candidate vector of WBDLe0

Not reportedInteractor role

Verbatim

e0

“H. phycitis is the best candidate vector of WBDL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1758–1807 · show in text ↑
t0

“Acid Lime Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended regular systemic insecticide spraying in November to March to reduce vectors and disease spread.

Taxon
acid lime treese0
Outcome
regular sprayings of acid lime trees with effective systemic insecticides during November to March each yeare0

Verbatim

e0

“regular sprayings of acid lime trees with effective systemic insecticides during November to March each year can greatly reduce the vector population and can prevent or delay the spread of the disease to a great extent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1959–2178 · show in text ↑