Paper · 2012 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Management of major sucking pests in Cotton by insecticides

A. Rohini; N. V. V. S. D. Prasad; M. S. V. Chalam

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

All the insecticides tested were superior to untreated check by recording lower population of sucking pests. Among the insecticides tested, acetamiprid 25 SP @ 0.2g/L was effective against aphids, fipronil 5 SC @ 2ml/L and acephate 75 SP @ 1.5g/L were found to be effective against thrips. In case of leafhoppers, fipronil 5 SC @ 2ml/L and imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.4ml/L were found to be promising. Whereas thiamethoxam 5 SG @ 0.2g/L was effective on whiteflies. Increase in plant height was observed in all insecticidal treated plots compared to untreated control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested insecticides lowered sucking pest populations relative to untreated check in cotton.

Treatment
insecticides testede0
Interactor
sucking pestse0pest
Outcome
population of sucking pestse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“All the insecticides tested were superior to untreated check by recording lower population of sucking pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid 25 SP @ 0.2g/L was effective against aphids in cotton.

Treatment
acetamiprid 25 SP @ 0.2g/Le1
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae1pest
Outcome
effective against aphidse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–43 · show in text ↑
e1

“acetamiprid 25 SP @ 0.2g/L was effective against aphids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–195 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fipronil 5 SC @ 2ml/L was effective against thrips in cotton.

Treatment
fipronil 5 SC @ 2ml/Le2
Interactor
thripsThripse2pest
Outcome
effective against thripse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–43 · show in text ↑
e2

“fipronil 5 SC @ 2ml/L and acephate 75 SP @ 1.5g/L were found to be effective against thrips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–288 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acephate 75 SP @ 1.5g/L was effective against thrips in cotton.

Treatment
acephate 75 SP @ 1.5g/Le2
Interactor
thripsThripse2pest
Outcome
effective against thripse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–43 · show in text ↑
e2

“fipronil 5 SC @ 2ml/L and acephate 75 SP @ 1.5g/L were found to be effective against thrips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–288 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fipronil 5 SC @ 2ml/L was promising against leafhoppers in cotton.

Treatment
fipronil 5 SC @ 2ml/Le3
Interactor
leafhoppersCicadellidaee3pest
Outcome
promisinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–43 · show in text ↑
e3

“In case of leafhoppers, fipronil 5 SC @ 2ml/L and imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.4ml/L were found to be promising”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–397 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.4ml/L was promising against leafhoppers in cotton.

Treatment
imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.4ml/Le3
Interactor
leafhoppersCicadellidaee3pest
Outcome
promisinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–43 · show in text ↑
e3

“In case of leafhoppers, fipronil 5 SC @ 2ml/L and imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.4ml/L were found to be promising”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–397 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam 5 SG @ 0.2g/L was effective against whiteflies in cotton.

Treatment
thiamethoxam 5 SG @ 0.2g/Le4
Interactor
whitefliesAleyrodoideae4pest
Outcome
effective on whitefliese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–43 · show in text ↑
e4

“thiamethoxam 5 SG @ 0.2g/L was effective on whiteflies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–461 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide-treated cotton plots had greater plant height than untreated controls.

Treatment
insecticidal treated plotse5
Outcome
plant heighte5
Direction
Increasee5
Comparator
untreated controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–43 · show in text ↑
e5

“Increase in plant height was observed in all insecticidal treated plots compared to untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–564 · show in text ↑

insecticide · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

18 papers: 7 positive, 11 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

insecticide · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

76 papers: 51 positive, 25 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.