Paper · 2011 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Identification of resistant sources against early blight disease of tomato

Prabhash C. Singh; Rajesh Kumar; Major Singh; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

One hundred forty two tomato genotypes including wild and cultivated lines were screened for resistance against early blight disease caused by Alternaria solani. Evaluations were conducted in vivo and in vitro for disease severity and host resistance of the plants. Eight lines (EC-520057, EC-520058, EC-520059, EC-520061, EC-508765, EC-538394, H-88-78-1 and EC-501583) showed highly resistant reaction against the fungus; three lines were found resistant, 5 lines moderately resistant whereas 33 lines showed moderately susceptible besides 57 susceptible and 36 highly susceptible lines against the disease under natural epiphytotic condition. Screening under in vitro, revealed that eight genotypes were highly resistant, 3 resistant and 7 as moderately resistant. It was found that the accessions of wild relatives of tomato were highly resistant which may be utilized for the development of pre-bred lines or recombinant inbred lines or in other molecular research activities for the improvement of tomato. Some of the cultivated genotypes as resistant/moderately resistant under in-vivo and in-vitro like H-86, VRT-2, NC EBR-4 and RCMT-1 may directly be promoted for growing in disease prone areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight tomato lines were highly resistant to early blight under natural conditions.

Material
EC-520057, EC-520058, EC-520059, EC-520061, EC-508765, EC-538394, H-88-78-1 and EC-501583e0
Interactor
Alternaria solaniAlternaria solanie1pathogen
Outcome
highly resistant reactione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria solani
Alternaria solani · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eight lines (EC-520057, EC-520058, EC-520059, EC-520061, EC-508765, EC-538394, H-88-78-1 and EC-501583) showed highly resistant reaction against the fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–421 · show in text ↑
e1

“Alternaria solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–160 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural screening classified three lines resistant, five moderately resistant, 33 moderately susceptible, 57 susceptible, and 36 highly susceptible.

Outcome
resistant, 5 lines moderately resistant whereas 33 lines showed moderately susceptible besides 57 susceptible and 36 highly susceptible linese0
Setting
natural epiphytotic conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three lines were found resistant, 5 lines moderately resistant whereas 33 lines showed moderately susceptible besides 57 susceptible and 36 highly susceptible lines against the disease under natural epiphytotic condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–643 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In vitro screening found eight genotypes highly resistant, three resistant and seven moderately resistant.

Outcome
highly resistant, 3 resistant and 7 as moderately resistante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“eight genotypes were highly resistant, 3 resistant and 7 as moderately resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Accessions of wild tomato relatives were highly resistant.

Material
accessions of wild relatives of tomatoe0
Outcome
highly resistante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“accessions of wild relatives of tomato were highly resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–849 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed resistant wild relatives for tomato improvement.

Outcome
development of pre-bred lines or recombinant inbred linese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“may be utilized for the development of pre-bred lines or recombinant inbred lines or in other molecular research activities for the improvement of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1009 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed H-86, VRT-2, NC EBR-4 and RCMT-1 for disease-prone areas.

Material
H-86, VRT-2, NC EBR-4 and RCMT-1e0
Outcome
growing in disease prone arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“H-86, VRT-2, NC EBR-4 and RCMT-1 may directly be promoted for growing in disease prone areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1202 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑