Paper · 2010 · Journal of Plant Disease Sciences

Efficacy of Fungicides and Phytoextracts Against Green Gram Leaf Blight Caused by Macrophomina Phaseolina

D. H. Tandel; A. N. Sabalpara; J. R. Pandya

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Efficacy of different fungicides and phytoextract were tested against green gram leaf blight caused by Macraphamina phaseolina. Amongst seven fungicides used maximum per cent disease control was recorded by one spraying of carbendazim + mancozeb (84.16%) followed by carbendazim (78.45%) and mancozeb (61.89%). Similarly, phytoextracts of eleven plant species evaluated in vitro against M. phaseolina from which onion bulb produced maximum growth inhibition (98.14%) followed by extract of acacia, ginger. The sclerotial formation was also not taken place in all these phytoextracts.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One spraying of carbendazim + mancozeb gave the maximum per cent disease control of green gram leaf blight, 84.16%.

Treatment
one spraying of carbendazim + mancozebe1
Interactor
Macraphamina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
per cent disease controle1
Direction
maximume1
Value
84.16%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“green gram leaf blight caused by Macraphamina phaseolina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum per cent disease control was recorded by one spraying of carbendazim + mancozeb (84.16%) followed by carbendazim (78.45%) and mancozeb (61.89%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim gave 78.45% disease control of green gram leaf blight, following the carbendazim + mancozeb spraying.

Treatment
carbendazime1
Interactor
Macraphamina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
per cent disease controle1
Direction
followed bye1
Value
78.45%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“green gram leaf blight caused by Macraphamina phaseolina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum per cent disease control was recorded by one spraying of carbendazim + mancozeb (84.16%) followed by carbendazim (78.45%) and mancozeb (61.89%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mancozeb gave 61.89% disease control of green gram leaf blight, following carbendazim.

Treatment
mancozebe1
Interactor
Macraphamina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
per cent disease controle1
Direction
followed bye1
Value
61.89%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“green gram leaf blight caused by Macraphamina phaseolina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum per cent disease control was recorded by one spraying of carbendazim + mancozeb (84.16%) followed by carbendazim (78.45%) and mancozeb (61.89%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion bulb phytoextract gave the maximum growth inhibition of Macrophomina phaseolina in vitro, 98.14%.

Treatment
onion bulbe2
Interactor
Macraphamina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
growth inhibitione2
Direction
maximume2
Value
98.14%e2
Setting
in vitroe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“green gram leaf blight caused by Macraphamina phaseolina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–126 · show in text ↑
e2

“onion bulb produced maximum growth inhibition (98.14%) followed by extract of acacia, ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–504 · show in text ↑
e3

“phytoextracts of eleven plant species evaluated in vitro against M. phaseolina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The phytoextracts prevented sclerotial formation of Macrophomina phaseolina.

Treatment
phytoextractse3
Interactor
Macraphamina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
sclerotial formatione4
Qualifier
not taken place in all these phytoextractse4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“green gram leaf blight caused by Macraphamina phaseolina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–126 · show in text ↑
e3

“phytoextracts of eleven plant species evaluated in vitro against M. phaseolina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–400 · show in text ↑
e4

“The sclerotial formation was also not taken place in all these phytoextracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–582 · show in text ↑

carbendazim · control · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mancozeb · control · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · control · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.