Abstract
In a pot experiment, Paecilomyces lilacinus cultured on wheat bran (WBF) was applied either as soil treatment 10 days before/after sowing 1g/kg soil (5 x 10[sup8] spores); as seed treatment (3 x 10[sup7] spores per seed); or in different combinations, to sandy soil infested with Meloidogyne javanica. Fungus application, in general, resulted in better top growth. The methods (soil/seed treatment) or time (pre/post - sowing) of fungus application were equally effective. Wheat bran alone (WB) also promoted shoot length and fresh shoot weight to a lesser extent. Root galling was significantly reduced in all fungus treatments. Application of WB alone failed to reduce root galling. The time and method of fungus application were at par as far as gall reduction was concerned. WBF proved better than carbofuran (1kg a.i/ha) in gall suppression.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Fungus application in general resulted in better top growth of okra.
- Taxon
- OKRA
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- Fungus applicatione0
- Outcome
- top growthe0
- Direction
- bettere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“ON OKRA”
e0“Fungus application, in general, resulted in better top growth”
Claim · model-written summary
The methods (soil or seed treatment) and time (pre or post sowing) of fungus application were equally effective.
- Taxon
- OKRAAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- methods (soil/seed treatment) or time (pre/post - sowing) of fungus applicatione0
- Outcome
- equally effectivee0
- Direction
- equally effectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“ON OKRA”
e0“The methods (soil/seed treatment) or time (pre/post - sowing) of fungus application were equally effective”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat bran alone also promoted shoot length and fresh shoot weight, to a lesser extent than the fungus.
- Taxon
- OKRAAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Wheat bran alone (WB)e0
- Outcome
- shoot length and fresh shoot weighte0
- Direction
- promotede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“ON OKRA”
e0“Wheat bran alone (WB) also promoted shoot length and fresh shoot weight to a lesser extent”
Claim · model-written summary
Root galling was significantly reduced in all fungus treatments.
- Taxon
- OKRAAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- all fungus treatmentse0
- Interactor
- MELOIDOGYNE JAVANICAMeloidogyne javanicat0pathogen
- Second interactor
- PAECILOMYCES LILACINUS
Purpureocillium lilacinumt0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- Root gallinge0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“PAECILOMYCES LILACINUS APPLIXATION TIME AND METHOD IN CONTROLLING MELOIDOGYNE JAVANICA ON OKRA”
e0“Root galling was significantly reduced in all fungus treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of wheat bran alone failed to reduce root galling.
- Taxon
- OKRAAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- WB alonee0
- Interactor
- MELOIDOGYNE JAVANICAMeloidogyne javanicat0pathogen
- Outcome
- root gallinge0
- Direction
- failed to reducee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“PAECILOMYCES LILACINUS APPLIXATION TIME AND METHOD IN CONTROLLING MELOIDOGYNE JAVANICA ON OKRA”
e0“Application of WB alone failed to reduce root galling”
Claim · model-written summary
The time and method of fungus application were at par for gall reduction.
- Taxon
- OKRAAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- time and method of fungus applicatione0
- Interactor
- MELOIDOGYNE JAVANICAMeloidogyne javanicat0pathogen
- Second interactor
- PAECILOMYCES LILACINUSPurpureocillium lilacinumt0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- gall reductione0
- Direction
- at pare0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“PAECILOMYCES LILACINUS APPLIXATION TIME AND METHOD IN CONTROLLING MELOIDOGYNE JAVANICA ON OKRA”
e0“The time and method of fungus application were at par as far as gall reduction was concerned”
Claim · model-written summary
The fungus on wheat bran (WBF) proved better than carbofuran (1 kg a.i/ha) in gall suppression.
- Taxon
- OKRAAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- WBFe0
- Interactor
- MELOIDOGYNE JAVANICAMeloidogyne javanicat0pathogen
- Second interactor
- PAECILOMYCES LILACINUSPurpureocillium lilacinumt0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- gall suppressione0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- carbofurane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“PAECILOMYCES LILACINUS APPLIXATION TIME AND METHOD IN CONTROLLING MELOIDOGYNE JAVANICA ON OKRA”
e0“WBF proved better than carbofuran (1kg a.i/ha) in gall suppression”