Paper · 2015 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Genetic studies on variability, heritability, genetic advance and cluster analysis in pear (Pyrusspp.)

Z.A. Bhat; W.S. Dhillon

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Data on 21 quantitative traits were subjected to genotypic and phenotypic coefficient of variation, heritability, genetic advance and clustering using D2 analysis with group constellation following Tocher's method. Phenotypic and genotypic coefficients of variation were high for fruit yield (46.58 and 46.55%), fruit length (47.06 and 42.69%) fruit weight (46.53 and 45.17%), pedicel length (38.47 and 37.82%) and TSS (39.62 and 36.1%) and medium to low for other traits. The estimates of heritability and genetic advance were maximum for fruit yield. High heritability estimates accompanied with greater genetic advance were observed for yield, fruit weight, pedicel length and fruit length indicating that these traits may be considered for selecting promising parents. Test genotypes were grouped into four clusters with maximum number of genotypes (6) in cluster I, 2 genotypes in cluster IV and one genotype each in clusters II and III. Highest inter-cluster distance (153.05) was between cluster II and IV, while highest intra-cluster distance was observed in cluster IV (36.24).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenotypic and genotypic variation were high for fruit yield, at 46.58 and 46.55%.

Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
highe0
Value
46.58 and 46.55%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear (Pyrusspp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Phenotypic and genotypic coefficients of variation were high for fruit yield (46.58 and 46.55%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–310 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variation was high for fruit length, at 47.06 and 42.69%.

Outcome
fruit lengthe0
Value
47.06 and 42.69%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear (Pyrusspp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“fruit length (47.06 and 42.69%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–343 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variation was high for fruit weight, at 46.53 and 45.17%.

Outcome
fruit weighte0
Value
46.53 and 45.17%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear (Pyrusspp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“fruit weight (46.53 and 45.17%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–375 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variation was high for pedicel length, at 38.47 and 37.82%.

Outcome
pedicel lengthe0
Value
38.47 and 37.82%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear (Pyrusspp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“pedicel length (38.47 and 37.82%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–410 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variation was high for TSS, at 39.62 and 36.1%.

Outcome
TSSe0
Value
39.62 and 36.1%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear (Pyrusspp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“TSS (39.62 and 36.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–436 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variation was medium to low for other traits.

Outcome
other traitse0
Direction
medium to lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear (Pyrusspp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“medium to low for other traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–471 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield had the maximum heritability and genetic advance.

Outcome
heritability and genetic advancee0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear (Pyrusspp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“The estimates of heritability and genetic advance were maximum for fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–551 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield, fruit weight, pedicel length and fruit length showed high heritability and genetic advance and were proposed for parent selection.

Outcome
heritability estimatese0
Direction
Highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear (Pyrusspp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“High heritability estimates accompanied with greater genetic advance were observed for yield, fruit weight, pedicel length and fruit length indicating that these traits may be considered for selecting promising parents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–771 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes formed four clusters, with six in cluster I.

Outcome
genotypese0
Direction
maximume0
Value
6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear (Pyrusspp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Test genotypes were grouped into four clusters with maximum number of genotypes (6) in cluster I”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–869 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster IV contained two genotypes.

Outcome
genotypese0
Value
2e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear (Pyrusspp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“2 genotypes in cluster IV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–896 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clusters II and III contained one genotype each.

Outcome
one genotypee0
Value
one genotypee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear (Pyrusspp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“one genotype each in clusters II and III”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–941 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest inter-cluster distance was 153.05 between clusters II and IV.

Outcome
inter-cluster distancee0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
153.05e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear (Pyrusspp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Highest inter-cluster distance (153.05) was between cluster II and IV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1012 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest intra-cluster distance was 36.24 in cluster IV.

Outcome
intra-cluster distancee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
36.24e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear (Pyrusspp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“highest intra-cluster distance was observed in cluster IV (36.24)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1085 · show in text ↑