Abstract
The studies were conducted in Koniczynka near Toruń in 2008–2011. The aim of the studies was an evaluation of soil fertilizer UGmax effect on the degree of leaf infection by leaf spot disease (Cercospora beticola Sacc.), sugar beet yield and roots quality in 2, 3 and 4-year crop rotation. Three experiments with a randomized complete block experimental design with four replications were carried out, one on each crop rotation. Analyses of research results showed that the crop rotation was the main factor determining the degree of leaf infection by C. beticola, roots and yield quality. Application of the soil fertilizer UGmax did not have any significant effect. Badania przeprowadzono w Koniczynce koło Torunia w latach 2008–2011. Oceniano wpływ użyźniacza glebowego UGmax zastosowanego w nawożeniu buraka cukrowego w płodozmianie 2-, 3- i 4-letnim na stopień porażenia roślin przez chwościka buraka Cercospora beticola Sacc. oraz na plon i jakość korzeni. Wykonano trzy doświadczenia, po jednym na każdym płodozmianie, w układzie losowanych bloków w czterech powtórzeniach. Synteza wyników z czterech lat badań wykazała, że płodozmian był głównym czynnikiem determinującym stopień porażenia roślin przez chwościka buraka oraz wielkość plonu korzeni i cukru. Stosowanie użyźniacza glebowego UGmax, niezależnie od wariantu, nie miało istotnego wpływu.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Crop rotation was the main factor determining leaf infection by C. beticola.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- crop rotatione0
- Interactor
- C. beticola
Cercospora beticolae0pathogen - Outcome
- degree of leaf infection by C. beticolae0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the crop rotation was the main factor determining the degree of leaf infection by C. beticola, roots and yield quality.”
t0“sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Crop rotation was the main factor determining root and yield quality.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- crop rotatione0
- Outcome
- roots and yield qualitye0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the crop rotation was the main factor determining the degree of leaf infection by C. beticola, roots and yield quality.”
t0“sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
UGmax did not have a significant effect on the studied sugar beet endpoints.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- soil fertilizer UGmaxe0
- Interactor
- Cercospora beticola Sacc.Cercospora beticolat0pathogen
- Outcome
- leaf infection degree by leaf spot disease (Cercospora beticola Sacc.)t0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of the soil fertilizer UGmax did not have any significant effect.”
t0“leaf infection degree by leaf spot disease (Cercospora beticola Sacc.) and yield and root quality of sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
UGmax did not have a significant effect on yield and root quality.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- soil fertilizer UGmaxe0
- Outcome
- yield and root qualityt0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of the soil fertilizer UGmax did not have any significant effect.”
t0“yield and root quality of sugar beet”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · Cercospora beticola · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
fertilization · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.