Abstract
Studies on fertilization and liming effect on hardseedness in greengram cv. AAU 34 revealed significant variation for hard seed yield. Liming resulted 21.81 and 31.95 per cent increase in hard seed production over non--liming during kharif and summer respectivley. A prominent effect on variation of hard seed production by different fertilizations were recorded with liming than without liming. Fertilization as 10-35-10 kg/ha N-P2O5,-K2O along with organic matter and Rhizobium inoculation resuited least production of hard seed whereas micronutrient sprays at flowering and pod formdtion stage with the same fertilization except K2O resulted maximum hard seed production in both the seasons.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments produced significant variation in hard seed yield.
- Taxon
- GREENGRAM
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiata var. radiatat0 - Outcome
- hard seed yielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“revealed significant variation for hard seed yield”
t0“GREENGRAM”
Claim · model-written summary
Liming increased hard seed production by 21.81% in kharif.
- Taxon
- GREENGRAMVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- Liminge0
- Outcome
- hard seed productione0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 21.81e0
- Qualifier
- kharife0
- Comparator
- non--liminge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Liming resulted 21.81 and 31.95 per cent increase in hard seed production over non--liming during kharif and summer respectivley”
t0“GREENGRAM”
Claim · model-written summary
Liming increased hard seed production by 31.95% in summer.
- Taxon
- GREENGRAMVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- Liminge0
- Outcome
- hard seed productione0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 31.95 per cente0
- Qualifier
- summere0
- Comparator
- non--liminge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Liming resulted 21.81 and 31.95 per cent increase in hard seed production over non--liming during kharif and summer respectivley”
t0“GREENGRAM”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer treatments varied hard seed production more with liming than without it.
- Taxon
- GREENGRAMVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- different fertilizationse0
- Outcome
- variation of hard seed productione0
- Direction
- prominente0
- Comparator
- without liminge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A prominent effect on variation of hard seed production by different fertilizations were recorded with liming than without liming”
t0“GREENGRAM”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK plus organic matter and Rhizobium inoculation yielded least hard seed production.
- Taxon
- GREENGRAMVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- 10-35-10 kg/ha N-P2O5,-K2O along with organic matter and Rhizobium inoculatione0
- Outcome
- production of hard seede0
- Direction
- leaste0
RhizobiumNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fertilization as 10-35-10 kg/ha N-P2O5,-K2O along with organic matter and Rhizobium inoculation resuited least production of hard seed”
t0“GREENGRAM”
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrient sprays with fertilization excluding K2O gave maximum hard seed production in both seasons.
- Taxon
- GREENGRAMVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- micronutrient sprays at flowering and pod formdtion stage with the same fertilization except K2Oe0
- Outcome
- hard seed productione0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“micronutrient sprays at flowering and pod formdtion stage with the same fertilization except K2O resulted maximum hard seed production in both the seasons”
t0“GREENGRAM”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ
120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
119 papers more in this group
See all 123 papers →micronutrient · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
10 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →lime · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
27 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →stage · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →organic · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →potassium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →inoculation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
180 papers more in this group
See all 184 papers →application · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
212 papers more in this group
See all 216 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.