Paper · 2002

Impact of Crop Rotation on Soilborne Diseases and Yield of Kidney Bean: a Case Study in Northern Japan

Hung‐Chang Huang; Fujio Kodama; Kazutaka Akashi; et al.

8
claims
9
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of crop rotation on diseases and yield of kidney bean were investigated using six of the plots in the long-term crop rotation experiment established since 1959 at the Hokkaido Prefectural Kitami Agricultural Experiment Station, Hokkaido, Japan. Data collected in 1994 showed that compared to the 6-year rotation, kidney bean cultivation in repeated monoculture resulted in a significant (P<0.05) reduction in plant height, aboveground plant biomass, pod number, seed yield, and seed size. During the last l2-year period (1989-2000), the average seed yield of kidney bean was 970 kg/ha in monoculture, representing a 59% loss as compared to the average yield of 2380 kg/ha in the 6-year rotation. Greenhouse tests of soil samples collected in 1994 revealed that the incidence of Pythium damping-off of kidney bean and sugar beet was highest (>66.1 %) in the soil from bean monoculture, modest in the soil from bare fallow, and lowest (<38.9%) in the soil from bean in the 6-year rotation. Fusarium yellow of kidney bean was detected at high frequency (87%) only in the soil of bean monoculture. These results from testing of soil samples and examination of field plants suggest that the stunting and yellowing of kidney bean plants observed in monoculture plots were due to a root rot complex caused by Pythium spp. and Fusarium spp. Several isolates of Pseudomonas sp. from healthy bean rootlets of the rotation plots showed suppressive effects to the damping-off pathogens in this field. This study suggests that the soil testing method is useful for studying activities of soilborne pathogens and beneficial microorganisms in microplots where removal of plants is restricted.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated monoculture significantly reduced kidney bean height, aboveground biomass, pod number, seed yield and seed size relative to six-year rotation.

Taxon
kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
repeated monoculturee0
Outcome
plant height, aboveground plant biomass, pod number, seed yield, and seed sizee0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
6-year rotatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared to the 6-year rotation, kidney bean cultivation in repeated monoculture resulted in a significant (P<0.05) reduction in plant height, aboveground plant biomass, pod number, seed yield, and seed size.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average kidney bean seed yield in monoculture was 970 kg/ha, a 59% loss against six-year rotation.

Taxon
kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
monoculturee0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
losse0
Value
970 kg/hae0
Qualifier
59% losse0
Comparator
6-year rotatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the average seed yield of kidney bean was 970 kg/ha in monoculture, representing a 59% loss as compared to the average yield of 2380 kg/ha in the 6-year rotation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pythium damping-off incidence in kidney bean was highest in bean monoculture soil and lowest in six-year rotation soil.

Taxon
kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
6-year rotatione0
Interactor
PythiumPythiume0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of Pythium damping-offe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
<38.9%e0
Comparator
bean monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pythium
Pythium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Doc. RNDr. Josef Reischig, CSc. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the incidence of Pythium damping-off of kidney bean and sugar beet was highest (>66.1 %) in the soil from bean monoculture, modest in the soil from bare fallow, and lowest (<38.9%) in the soil from bean in the 6-year rotation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–999 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pythium damping-off incidence in sugar beet was highest in bean monoculture soil and lowest in six-year rotation soil.

Treatment
6-year rotatione0
Interactor
PythiumPythiume0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of Pythium damping-offe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
<38.9%e0
Comparator
bean monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pythium
Pythium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Doc. RNDr. Josef Reischig, CSc. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the incidence of Pythium damping-off of kidney bean and sugar beet was highest (>66.1 %) in the soil from bean monoculture, modest in the soil from bare fallow, and lowest (<38.9%) in the soil from bean in the 6-year rotation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–999 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium yellow of kidney bean was detected at 87% frequency only in bean monoculture soil.

Taxon
kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
bean monoculturee0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium yellowe0
Value
87%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium yellow of kidney bean was detected at high frequency (87%) only in the soil of bean monoculture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1105 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute stunting and yellowing in monoculture kidney beans to Pythium and Fusarium root rot.

Taxon
kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Interactor
Pythium spp.Pythiume0pathogen
Second interactor
Fusarium spp.Fusariume0pathogen
Outcome
stunting and yellowinge0
Qualifier
root rot complexe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pythium
Pythium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Doc. RNDr. Josef Reischig, CSc. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the stunting and yellowing of kidney bean plants observed in monoculture plots were due to a root rot complex caused by Pythium spp. and Fusarium spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas isolates from healthy bean roots suppressed damping-off pathogens.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
isolates of Pseudomonas sp.e0
Interactor
damping-off pathogense0pathogen
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
damping-off pathogense0
Direction
suppressivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Several isolates of Pseudomonas sp. from healthy bean rootlets of the rotation plots showed suppressive effects to the damping-off pathogens in this field.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1500 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The soil testing method was judged useful for studying soilborne pathogen and beneficial microorganism activity in restricted microplots.

Taxon
Kidney BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
useful for studying activities of soilborne pathogens and beneficial microorganismse0
Qualifier
microplots where removal of plants is restrictede0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil testing method is useful for studying activities of soilborne pathogens and beneficial microorganisms in microplots where removal of plants is restricted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1689 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kidney Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

rotation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.