Paper · 1998 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Performance of Clodinafop and Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl for the Control of Phalaris minor in Wheat

U. S. Walia; L. S. Brar; Balbindar Dhaliwal

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at the Research Farm of Department of Agronomy, PAU, Ludhiana during 1994–95 and 1995–96. The field was sandy loam in texture and was under rice-wheat system sinlge last seven years. Experimental results revealed that post-emergence application of dodinafop at 80 and 120 mllha and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl at 80 ml/ha provided good control of Phalaris millor and produced grain yield at par with diclofop-methyl 0.90 kg and tralkoxydim 0.35 kg/ha. Application of c1odinafop 120 ml and fenoxaprop-ethyl gO ml/ha increased the grain yield by 68.7 and 60.4% over control (unweeded) and 34.1 and 29.8% over two hand hocings, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

dodinafop at 80 controlled Phalaris in wheat.

Treatment
dodinafop at 80e0
Interactor
Phalaris millore0weed
Outcome
control of Phalaris millore0
Direction
good controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“post-emergence application of dodinafop at 80 and 120 mllha and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl at 80 ml/ha provided good control of Phalaris millor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–386 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

120 mllha controlled Phalaris in wheat.

Treatment
120 mllhae0
Interactor
Phalaris millore0weed
Outcome
control of Phalaris millore0
Direction
good controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“post-emergence application of dodinafop at 80 and 120 mllha and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl at 80 ml/ha provided good control of Phalaris millor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–386 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

fenoxaprop-p-ethyl at 80 ml/ha controlled Phalaris in wheat.

Treatment
fenoxaprop-p-ethyl at 80 ml/hae0
Interactor
Phalaris millore0weed
Outcome
control of Phalaris millore0
Direction
good controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“post-emergence application of dodinafop at 80 and 120 mllha and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl at 80 ml/ha provided good control of Phalaris millor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–386 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These herbicide treatments gave grain yield at par with reference herbicides.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
diclofop-methyl 0.90 kg and tralkoxydim 0.35 kg/hae0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“produced grain yield at par with diclofop-methyl 0.90 kg and tralkoxydim 0.35 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop increased grain yield by 68.7% over unweeded control.

Treatment
c1odinafop 120 mle0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
68.7e0
Comparator
control (unweeded)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of c1odinafop 120 ml and fenoxaprop-ethyl gO ml/ha increased the grain yield by 68.7 and 60.4% over control (unweeded) and 34.1 and 29.8% over two hand hocings, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–661 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop increased grain yield by 60.4% over unweeded control.

Treatment
fenoxaprop-ethyl gO ml/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
60.4%e0
Comparator
control (unweeded)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of c1odinafop 120 ml and fenoxaprop-ethyl gO ml/ha increased the grain yield by 68.7 and 60.4% over control (unweeded) and 34.1 and 29.8% over two hand hocings, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–661 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop increased grain yield by 34.1% over two hand hoeings.

Treatment
c1odinafop 120 mle0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
34.1e0
Comparator
two hand hocingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of c1odinafop 120 ml and fenoxaprop-ethyl gO ml/ha increased the grain yield by 68.7 and 60.4% over control (unweeded) and 34.1 and 29.8% over two hand hocings, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–661 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop increased grain yield by 29.8% over two hand hoeings.

Treatment
fenoxaprop-ethyl gO ml/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
29.8%e0
Comparator
two hand hocingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of c1odinafop 120 ml and fenoxaprop-ethyl gO ml/ha increased the grain yield by 68.7 and 60.4% over control (unweeded) and 34.1 and 29.8% over two hand hocings, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–661 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑

Fenoxaprop ethyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.