Abstract
Different isolates of VAM fungi like Glomus fasciculatum, G. etunicatum, G. mosseae, G. constrictum, G. monosporum and A. morroweae were evaluated for their efficacy in controlling root-knot nematode infestation in brinjal. These cultures did not show any significant difference in growth parameters (height and number of leaves) at transplanting and one month after transplanting. Later, (45 and 60 days after transplanting) significant increase in height and number of leaves were observed in plants raised in soil inoculated with G. etunicatum and G. fasciculatum. Higher percentage of VA mycorrhizal colonisation was observed in plants artificially inoculated with VAM. Plants raised in G. etunicatum, G. fasciculatum and G. monosporum recorded significantly lower root-knot indices. The fecundity of the nematode was also significantly reduced in mycorrhizae treated plants. G. fasciculatum registered the lowest population per gram root while G. fasciculatum and G. constrictum significantly lowered the nematode population in the soil.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
VAM cultures did not significantly differ in plant height and leaf number at transplanting and one month later.
- Taxon
- Brinjal
Solanum melongenat0 - Treatment
- These culturese0
- Outcome
- height and number of leavese0
- Direction
- did not show any significant differencee0
- Qualifier
- at transplanting and one month after transplantinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“These cultures did not show any significant difference in growth parameters (height and number of leaves) at transplanting and one month after transplanting.”
t0“Brinjal”
Claim · model-written summary
G. etunicatum increased height and leaf number at 45 and 60 days after transplanting.
- Taxon
- BrinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- soil inoculated with G. etunicatume0
- Interactor
- G. etunicatume0symbiont
- Outcome
- height and number of leavese0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Qualifier
- 45 and 60 days after transplantinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Later, (45 and 60 days after transplanting) significant increase in height and number of leaves were observed in plants raised in soil inoculated with G. etunicatum and G. fasciculatum.”
t0“Brinjal”
Claim · model-written summary
G. fasciculatum increased height and leaf number at 45 and 60 days after transplanting.
- Taxon
- BrinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- soil inoculated with G. etunicatum and G. fasciculatume0
- Interactor
- G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
- Outcome
- height and number of leavese0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Qualifier
- 45 and 60 days after transplantinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Later, (45 and 60 days after transplanting) significant increase in height and number of leaves were observed in plants raised in soil inoculated with G. etunicatum and G. fasciculatum.”
t0“Brinjal”
Claim · model-written summary
Artificial VAM inoculation gave higher mycorrhizal colonisation.
- Taxon
- BrinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- artificially inoculated with VAMe0
- Interactor
- VAMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- VA mycorrhizal colonisatione0
- Direction
- Highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Higher percentage of VA mycorrhizal colonisation was observed in plants artificially inoculated with VAM.”
t0“Brinjal”
Claim · model-written summary
G. etunicatum reduced root-knot indices.
- Taxon
- BrinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- G. etunicatume0
- Interactor
- root-knote0pathogen
- Second interactor
- G. etunicatume0symbiont
- Outcome
- root-knot indicese0
- Direction
- lowere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plants raised in G. etunicatum, G. fasciculatum and G. monosporum recorded significantly lower root-knot indices.”
t0“Brinjal”
Claim · model-written summary
G. fasciculatum reduced root-knot indices.
- Taxon
- BrinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- G. fasciculatume0
- Interactor
- root-knote0pathogen
- Second interactor
- G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
- Outcome
- root-knot indicese0
- Direction
- lowere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plants raised in G. etunicatum, G. fasciculatum and G. monosporum recorded significantly lower root-knot indices.”
t0“Brinjal”
Claim · model-written summary
G. monosporum reduced root-knot indices.
- Taxon
- BrinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- G. monosporume0
- Interactor
- root-knote0pathogen
- Second interactor
- G. monosporumFunneliformis monosporuse0symbiont
- Outcome
- root-knot indicese0
- Direction
- lowere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plants raised in G. etunicatum, G. fasciculatum and G. monosporum recorded significantly lower root-knot indices.”
t0“Brinjal”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizae treatment significantly reduced nematode fecundity.
- Taxon
- BrinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- mycorrhizae treatede0
- Outcome
- fecundity of the nematodee0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The fecundity of the nematode was also significantly reduced in mycorrhizae treated plants.”
t0“Brinjal”
Claim · model-written summary
G. fasciculatum registered the lowest nematode population per gram root.
- Taxon
- BrinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- G. fasciculatume0
- Interactor
- G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
- Outcome
- population per gram roote0
- Direction
- loweste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“G. fasciculatum registered the lowest population per gram root”
t0“Brinjal”
Claim · model-written summary
G. fasciculatum significantly lowered soil nematode population.
- Taxon
- BrinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- G. fasciculatume0
- Second interactor
- G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
- Outcome
- nematode population in the soile0
- Direction
- lowerede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“G. fasciculatum and G. constrictum significantly lowered the nematode population in the soil.”
t0“Brinjal”
Claim · model-written summary
G. constrictum significantly lowered soil nematode population.
- Taxon
- BrinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- G. constrictume0
- Second interactor
- G. constrictumSeptoglomus constrictume0symbiont
- Outcome
- nematode population in the soile0
- Direction
- lowerede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“G. fasciculatum and G. constrictum significantly lowered the nematode population in the soil.”
t0“Brinjal”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizophagus fasciculatus · growth · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
inoculation · growth · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results
37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
45 papers more in this group
See all 49 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.