Paper · 2006 · Acta Horticulturae

THE SICILIAN PEACH (PRUNUS PERSICA L. BATSCH) GERMPLASM: HORTICULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS AND SANITARY STATUS

M. Monte; F. Sottile; E. Barone; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The decrease in worldwide consumption of peaches due to the poor flavour quality of the fruit has increased the demand for new tasty cultivars. The availability of plant genetic resources is an important prerequisite for improving fruit quality by breeding. In Sicily there is a large collection of local cultivated peaches, whose production fills a niche in the local markets, but which is at risk of disappearing. Their characteristics include highly aromatic fruit and late ripening. Because of their important agronomic characteristics, the Department of Colture Arboree of Palermo University has collected the most interesting accessions to safeguard them and to use the indigenous resources in breeding programmes. To assess the molecular diversity within the Sicilian germplasm, 26 cultivars were screened with 15 SSRs. Eight international cultivars were also included in the analysis as controls. The number of alleles per primer pair ranged from 3 to 10 (mean = 4.7) and 15 cultivars showed a unique fingerprint. The observed heterozygosity was 0.44. Some cases of homonyms and synonyms were found. Furthermore several phenotypically different accessions were indistinguishable at the molecular level, maybe because of the occurrence of co-ancestry and inbreeding. The genetic relationships among the Sicilian cultivars were presented in a dendrogram constructed using the UPGMA method. Clusters reflected their geographical origins.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSR allele counts ranged from 3 to 10 per primer pair, with a mean of 4.7.

Outcome
number of alleles per primer paire0
Value
3 to 10 (mean = 4.7)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of alleles per primer pair ranged from 3 to 10 (mean = 4.7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEACH (PRUNUS PERSICA L. BATSCH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifteen cultivars had unique SSR fingerprints.

Outcome
unique fingerprinte0
Value
15 cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“15 cultivars showed a unique fingerprint”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEACH (PRUNUS PERSICA L. BATSCH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Observed heterozygosity was 0.44.

Outcome
observed heterozygositye0
Value
0.44e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The observed heterozygosity was 0.44”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEACH (PRUNUS PERSICA L. BATSCH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Homonyms and synonyms occurred among the cultivars.

Outcome
homonyms and synonymse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Some cases of homonyms and synonyms were found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEACH (PRUNUS PERSICA L. BATSCH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several phenotypically different accessions were indistinguishable at the molecular level.

Outcome
phenotypically different accessions were indistinguishable at the molecular levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“several phenotypically different accessions were indistinguishable at the molecular level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1209 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEACH (PRUNUS PERSICA L. BATSCH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–45 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivar clusters reflected geographical origins.

Outcome
Clusterse0
Setting
geographical originse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clusters reflected their geographical origins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1441 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEACH (PRUNUS PERSICA L. BATSCH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–45 · show in text ↑