Paper · 2014 · The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences

Characterization of chickpea germplasm for nodulation and effect of rhizobium inoculation on nodules number and seed yield.

Rozina Gul; Hilal Musadiq Khan; Naqib Ullah Khan; et al.

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
18
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm, collected from diverse research centers of the world were characterized for nodulation (Nod + or Nod - ) and evaluated for response to seed inoculation with Rhizobium leguminosarumin terms of number of nodules plant -1 and seed yield plant -1 . Forty three genotypes, procured from Nuclear Institute for Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Peshawar, Gram Research Station (GRS) Karak and International Center for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas (ICARDA), Syria, showed nodulation (Nod + ) while four genotypes, received from International Crops Research Institute for the Semi -Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), India failed to produce any nodule (Nod - ). Pooled analysis of variance for both the traits revealed highly significant differences among genotypes, interaction of genotypes with treatment and also between treatments (inoculated and un-inoculated/control). Inoculated genotypes exceeded control in treatment means both for nodules plant -1 (10.86 and 7.86) and seed yield plant -1 (15.1 g and 10.0 g). High heritability estimates for nodules plant -1 (53.2) and seed yield plant -1 (77.0) as well as low level of difference s among PCV and GCV of both the traits showed that genotypes played more influential role in the expression of these characters. It is concluded that the studied germplasm could be successfully utilized in future breeding programs. Furthermore, Genotypes Karak -3 is recommended for general cultivation and NDC 5-S10 for crop rotation programs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forty three chickpea genotypes showed nodulation.

Taxon
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Material
Forty three genotypese0
Outcome
showed nodulation (Nod + )e0
Setting
Syriae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Forty three genotypes, procured from Nuclear Institute for Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Peshawar, Gram Research Station (GRS) Karak and International Center for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas (ICARDA), Syria, showed nodulation (Nod + ) while four genotypes, received from International Crops Research Institute for the Semi -Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), India failed to produce any nodule (Nod - )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four chickpea genotypes from ICRISAT failed to form nodules.

Taxon
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Material
four genotypese0
Outcome
failed to produce any nodule (Nod - )e0
Setting
Indiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Forty three genotypes, procured from Nuclear Institute for Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Peshawar, Gram Research Station (GRS) Karak and International Center for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas (ICARDA), Syria, showed nodulation (Nod + ) while four genotypes, received from International Crops Research Institute for the Semi -Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), India failed to produce any nodule (Nod - )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodule number and seed yield showed highly significant differences among genotypes.

Taxon
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
inoculated and un-inoculated/controle0
Outcome
differences among genotypese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pooled analysis of variance for both the traits revealed highly significant differences among genotypes, interaction of genotypes with treatment and also between treatments (inoculated and un-inoculated/control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodule number and seed yield showed highly significant interaction of genotypes with treatment.

Taxon
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
inoculated and un-inoculated/controle0
Outcome
interaction of genotypes with treatmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pooled analysis of variance for both the traits revealed highly significant differences among genotypes, interaction of genotypes with treatment and also between treatments (inoculated and un-inoculated/control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodule number and seed yield showed highly significant between treatments (inoculated and un-inoculated/control).

Taxon
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
inoculated and un-inoculated/controle0
Outcome
between treatments (inoculated and un-inoculated/control)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pooled analysis of variance for both the traits revealed highly significant differences among genotypes, interaction of genotypes with treatment and also between treatments (inoculated and un-inoculated/control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated chickpea exceeded controls for nodules plant -1, 10.86 versus 7.86.

Taxon
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Inoculatede0
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarumine1symbiont
Outcome
nodules plant -1e0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
10.86e0
Qualifier
7.86e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated genotypes exceeded control in treatment means both for nodules plant -1 (10.86 and 7.86) and seed yield plant -1 (15.1 g and 10.0 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium leguminosarumin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–223 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated chickpea exceeded controls for seed yield plant -1, 15.1 g versus 10.0 g.

Taxon
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Inoculatede0
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarumine1symbiont
Outcome
seed yield plant -1e0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
15.1 ge0
Qualifier
10.0 ge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated genotypes exceeded control in treatment means both for nodules plant -1 (10.86 and 7.86) and seed yield plant -1 (15.1 g and 10.0 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium leguminosarumin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–223 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

nodules plant -1 had high heritability of 53.2.

Taxon
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Outcome
High heritability estimates for nodules plant -1e0
Value
53.2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High heritability estimates for nodules plant -1 (53.2) and seed yield plant -1 (77.0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

seed yield plant -1 had high heritability of 77.0.

Taxon
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Outcome
seed yield plant -1e0
Value
77.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High heritability estimates for nodules plant -1 (53.2) and seed yield plant -1 (77.0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low PCV–GCV differences suggested genotype predominance for nodules per plant and seed yield.

Taxon
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Outcome
genotypes played more influential rolee0
Comparator
PCV and GCVe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low level of difference s among PCV and GCV of both the traits showed that genotypes played more influential role in the expression of these characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1290 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose the studied germplasm for future breeding.

Taxon
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Outcome
utilized in future breeding programse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the studied germplasm could be successfully utilized in future breeding programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1393 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Karak -3 was recommended for general cultivation.

Taxon
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Material
Karak -3e0
Outcome
general cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotypes Karak -3 is recommended for general cultivation and NDC 5-S10 for crop rotation programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1506 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

NDC 5-S10 was recommended for crop rotation programs.

Taxon
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Material
NDC 5-S10e0
Outcome
crop rotation programse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotypes Karak -3 is recommended for general cultivation and NDC 5-S10 for crop rotation programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1506 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑

inoculation · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 110 positive, 4 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.