Paper · 1993 · HortScience

SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION SYSTEMS -- OVERSEEDING AND TILLAGE EFFECTS ON WEED SUPPRESSION AND BROCCOLI YIELD

Tammam Serage; Ronald Morse

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Experiments were conducted at two sites in Virginia to study the effects of tillage (conventional plow-disk and no-tillage) and overseeding of legume cover crops (red clover, Trifolium pretense L .; white clover, Trifolium repens L.; and hairy vetch, Vicia vellosa Roth .) at transplanting on weed suppression and yield of `Big Sur' broccoli ( Brassica oleracea var. Italica Plenck) . In both sites, weed suppression from overseeding was as good and in some cases superior to that in the herbicide-treated control plots. With the exception of hairy vetch in site 2, overseeding did not reduce broccoli yield. Weed suppression and broccoli yield were unaffected by tillage system and there were no tillage × overseeding effects. Based on our data, overseeding legumes could be an important component of our no-till system as we move towards more sustainable production methods for vegetables.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Legume overseeding suppressed weeds at least as well as herbicide control.

Treatment
overseedinge0
Outcome
weed suppressione0
Direction
as good and in some cases superiore0
Comparator
herbicide-treated control plotse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In both sites, weed suppression from overseeding was as good and in some cases superior to that in the herbicide-treated control plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–520 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overseeding generally did not reduce broccoli yield except hairy vetch at site 2.

Treatment
overseedinge0
Outcome
broccoli yielde0
Direction
did not reducee0
Qualifier
exception of hairy vetch in site 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the exception of hairy vetch in site 2, overseeding did not reduce broccoli yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage system did not affect weed suppression or broccoli yield.

Treatment
tillage systeme0
Outcome
Weed suppression and broccoli yielde0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed suppression and broccoli yield were unaffected by tillage system and there were no tillage × overseeding effects.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage by overseeding interaction was found.

Treatment
tillage × overseedinge0
Outcome
effectse0
Direction
noe0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“there were no tillage × overseeding effects.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–727 · show in text ↑

tillage · weed · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.