Paper · 2013

Evaluation on the effects of insecticides on biodiversity of arthropod in rice ecosystem.

Wan Norazwani Wan Jaafar; Norida Mazlan; Nur Azura Adam; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of insecticides from different toxicity levels and mode of actions against spider and insect abundance in a rice ecosystem. Three commercially available insecticides, namely fipronil (Regent®), cartap hydrochloride (Padan®) and chlorantraniliprole (Prevathon®) were selected for the study. Observations were carried from 12 days after sowing until 89 days after sowing. Fipronil and cartap hydrochloride treatments had significantly reduced natural enemy populations. Insecticide treatments does not reduce the number of pest in the treatments plots compared to control plot, however, it reduced the natural enemies populations. The experiment shown, the insecticide chlorantraniliprole has the best efficacy in controlling the pest and at same time it has the least effects to non-target arthropods in the field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fipronil significantly reduced natural enemy populations in rice.

Treatment
Fipronile0
Outcome
natural enemy populationse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fipronil and cartap hydrochloride treatments had significantly reduced natural enemy populations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–519 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cartap hydrochloride significantly reduced natural enemy populations in rice.

Treatment
cartap hydrochloridee0
Outcome
natural enemy populationse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fipronil and cartap hydrochloride treatments had significantly reduced natural enemy populations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–519 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide treatments did not reduce pests relative to control plots in rice.

Treatment
Insecticide treatmentse0
Interactor
peste0pest
Outcome
number of peste0
Direction
does not reducee0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Insecticide treatments does not reduce the number of pest in the treatments plots compared to control plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–626 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole had the best pest-control efficacy in rice.

Treatment
chlorantraniliprolee0
Interactor
peste0pest
Outcome
efficacy in controlling the peste0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the insecticide chlorantraniliprole has the best efficacy in controlling the pest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole had the least effect on non-target arthropods in rice fields.

Treatment
chlorantraniliprolee0
Outcome
effects to non-target arthropodse0
Direction
leaste0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorantraniliprole has the best efficacy in controlling the pest and at same time it has the least effects to non-target arthropods in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–864 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–88 · show in text ↑

hydrochloride · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

cartap · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

fipronil · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 22 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

chlorantraniliprole · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.