Paper · 2002 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Effect of vermicompost with and without fertilizer on greengram

D. J. Rajkhowa; Monimala Saikia; Kaberi Rajkhowa

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
22
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of vermicompost alone or in combination with fertilizer on greengram in summer 1998. Significant increase in growth characters, yield components and yield of greengram was achieved following combined use of vermicompost and fertilizer, Results showed the possibility ot saving 25 to 50 per cent fertilizer through the addition of 2.5 t ha−1 vermicompost.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined use of vermicompost and fertilizer significantly increased growth characters, yield components and yield of greengram.

Treatment
combined use of vermicompost and fertilizere1
Outcome
growth characters, yield components and yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Setting
summer 1998e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of vermicompost alone or in combination with fertilizer on greengram in summer 1998”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–137 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant increase in growth characters, yield components and yield of greengram was achieved following combined use of vermicompost and fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 2.5 t ha-1 vermicompost may save 25 to 50 per cent of the fertilizer for greengram.

Treatment
addition of 2.5 t ha−1 vermicomposte2
Outcome
savinge2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Value
25 to 50 per cente2
Comparator
fertilizere2
Setting
summer 1998e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of vermicompost alone or in combination with fertilizer on greengram in summer 1998”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–137 · show in text ↑
e2

“possibility ot saving 25 to 50 per cent fertilizer through the addition of 2.5 t ha−1 vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–407 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.