Paper · 2013 · Trends in Biosciences/Trends in biosciences

Growth of Greengram (Vigna radiata L.) as Influenced by Foliar Nutrition of Nitrogen and Phosphorus

Sunil Kumar; S.K. Patel; Vinod Kumar; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during Zaid season of 2007 to study the effect of foliar nutrition of nitrogen and Phosphorus on growth and yield of greengram (Vigna radiata L.) at Crop Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, SHIATS, Allahabad. The experimental findings showed the growth and overall performance of greengram was greatly influenced by four levels of recommended dose of fertilizers (N&P) viz., control, 100%, 85% and 70% and four foliar spray viz., control, water spray, urea 2% spray and DAP 2% spray at 20 and 40 DAS and with replicated three times in factorial randomized block design. Significantly maximum plant height, No. of leaves per plant, No. of branches per plant, No. of nodules per plant, No. of flowers per plant and dry weight per plant were obtained from RDF-85%, DAP 2% foliar spray and combination of RDF-85% with DAP 2% foliar spray.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF-85%, DAP 2% spray, and their combination gave significantly maximal plant height, leaves, and branches per plant.

Treatment
RDF-85%e0
Outcome
plant height, No. of leaves per plant, No. of branches per plante0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly maximum plant height, No. of leaves per plant, No. of branches per plant, No. of nodules per plant, No. of flowers per plant and dry weight per plant were obtained from RDF-85%, DAP 2% foliar spray and combination of RDF-85% with DAP 2% foliar spray.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 10–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF-85%, DAP 2% spray, and their combination gave significantly maximal nodules, flowers, and dry weight per plant.

Treatment
DAP 2% foliar spraye0
Outcome
No. of nodules per plant, No. of flowers per plant and dry weight per plante0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly maximum plant height, No. of leaves per plant, No. of branches per plant, No. of nodules per plant, No. of flowers per plant and dry weight per plant were obtained from RDF-85%, DAP 2% foliar spray and combination of RDF-85% with DAP 2% foliar spray.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 10–19 · show in text ↑

application · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.