Abstract
A field experiment was conducted to assess performance of newly developed five mid late and late sugarcane cultivars, i.e. Co 0121, Co 0123, Co 0124 and Co 0241 along with CoS 767(standard) with two row spacing (75 and 90 cm) under three fertility levels, i.e. 75, 100 (N150 P21.8 K41.5) and 125% of recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) with plant-ratoon system. Varieties Co 0121 and Co 0241 recorded the maximum and significantly higher cane yield (69.1 and 67.2 tonnes/ha) and commercial cane sugar (10.22 and 9.00 tonnes/ha) in plant and ratoon crop, respectively. In ratoon crop number of millable canes (NMC) and cane yield increased substantially by 10.5 and 10.3 per cent, respectively with 75 cm row spacing. Closer spacing fetched maximum net return (` 24 810 and ` 47 820) with benefit: cost ratio of 1.42 and 2.27 with plant as well as ratoon crop, respectively. Fertility level of 125% RDF, being at par with 100% RDF registered improvement in yield attributes and produced increased cane yield and CCS both from plant as well as ratoon crop over 75% RDF. Except varieties, the quality parameters did not undergo significant variation due to change in row spacing and fertility treatments. Cultivar×fertility level interactions indicated that varieties Co 0121 and Co 0241 were equally productive at normal fertility level of 100% RDF.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Co 0121 produced a significantly higher plant-crop cane yield of 69.1 tonnes/ha.
Verbatim
e0“Varieties Co 0121 and Co 0241 recorded the maximum and significantly higher cane yield (69.1 and 67.2 tonnes/ha) and commercial cane sugar (10.22 and 9.00 tonnes/ha) in plant and ratoon crop, respectively”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Co 0241 produced a significantly higher ratoon-crop cane yield of 67.2 tonnes/ha.
Verbatim
e0“Varieties Co 0121 and Co 0241 recorded the maximum and significantly higher cane yield (69.1 and 67.2 tonnes/ha) and commercial cane sugar (10.22 and 9.00 tonnes/ha) in plant and ratoon crop, respectively”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Co 0121 yielded 10.22 tonnes/ha commercial cane sugar in the plant crop.
Verbatim
e0“Varieties Co 0121 and Co 0241 recorded the maximum and significantly higher cane yield (69.1 and 67.2 tonnes/ha) and commercial cane sugar (10.22 and 9.00 tonnes/ha) in plant and ratoon crop, respectively”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Co 0241 yielded 9.00 tonnes/ha commercial cane sugar in the ratoon crop.
Verbatim
e0“Varieties Co 0121 and Co 0241 recorded the maximum and significantly higher cane yield (69.1 and 67.2 tonnes/ha) and commercial cane sugar (10.22 and 9.00 tonnes/ha) in plant and ratoon crop, respectively”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Ratoon millable cane number increased 10.5 percent under 75 cm spacing.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- 75 cm row spacinge0
- Outcome
- number of millable canese0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 10.5e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“In ratoon crop number of millable canes (NMC) and cane yield increased substantially by 10.5 and 10.3 per cent, respectively with 75 cm row spacing”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Ratoon cane yield increased 10.3 percent under 75 cm spacing.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- 75 cm row spacinge0
- Outcome
- cane yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 10.3 per cente0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“In ratoon crop number of millable canes (NMC) and cane yield increased substantially by 10.5 and 10.3 per cent, respectively with 75 cm row spacing”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Closer spacing produced a net return of 24 810 in the plant crop.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Closer spacing fetched maximum net return (` 24 810 and ` 47 820) with benefit: cost ratio of 1.42 and 2.27 with plant as well as ratoon crop, respectively”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Closer spacing produced a net return of 47 820 in the ratoon crop.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Closer spacing fetched maximum net return (` 24 810 and ` 47 820) with benefit: cost ratio of 1.42 and 2.27 with plant as well as ratoon crop, respectively”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
The benefit-cost ratio under closer spacing was 1.42 for plant cane.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“Closer spacing fetched maximum net return (` 24 810 and ` 47 820) with benefit: cost ratio of 1.42 and 2.27 with plant as well as ratoon crop, respectively”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
The benefit-cost ratio under closer spacing was 2.27 for ratoon cane.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“Closer spacing fetched maximum net return (` 24 810 and ` 47 820) with benefit: cost ratio of 1.42 and 2.27 with plant as well as ratoon crop, respectively”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer at 125% RDF improved yield attributes relative to 75% RDF and was at par with 100% RDF.
Verbatim
e0“Fertility level of 125% RDF, being at par with 100% RDF registered improvement in yield attributes and produced increased cane yield and CCS both from plant as well as ratoon crop over 75% RDF”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer at 125% RDF increased cane yield over 75% RDF in plant and ratoon crops.
Verbatim
e0“Fertility level of 125% RDF, being at par with 100% RDF registered improvement in yield attributes and produced increased cane yield and CCS both from plant as well as ratoon crop over 75% RDF”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer at 125% RDF increased commercial cane sugar over 75% RDF in plant and ratoon crops.
Verbatim
e0“Fertility level of 125% RDF, being at par with 100% RDF registered improvement in yield attributes and produced increased cane yield and CCS both from plant as well as ratoon crop over 75% RDF”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Row spacing and fertility treatments did not significantly change sugarcane quality parameters.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- row spacing and fertility treatmentse0
- Outcome
- quality parameterse0
- Direction
- did not undergo significant variatione0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Except varieties, the quality parameters did not undergo significant variation due to change in row spacing and fertility treatments”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Co 0121 and Co 0241 were equally productive at 100% RDF.
Verbatim
e0“varieties Co 0121 and Co 0241 were equally productive at normal fertility level of 100% RDF”
t0“sugarcane”
The same questions in other papers
density · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →density · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
45 papers more in this group
See all 49 papers →fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
342 papers more in this group
See all 346 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.