Paper · 2012

Influence of diferend methods of fertilization on energy production of winter barley

Roman Brezina; Richard Pospíšil; J. Molárová; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This work is aimed to determine and analyze the impact of nutrition and fertilization, genotypes and year-class to the height and technological quality of the yield of winter barley grown at the EXBA FAPZ SPU site in Nitra - Dolna Malanta. Field semioperational experiments with two monitored genotypes of winter barley (Wintmalt and Malwinta) were established in the 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 periods with four fertilization variants in three repetitions using the tillage method and maintaining randomness. We used two genotypes to monitor selected indicator technology - extraction. The average yield reached 7.83 t per ha for 2008/2009 for both monitored genotypes and 7.76 t per ha in 2009/2010. Wintmalt reached lower yield of 0.15 t per ha if compared to Malwinta - 7.87 t per ha for both monitored years. In 2008/2009, the d-fertilization variant (NH4N03+HAK0FYT extra) - 9.58 t per ha was the best fertilization variant for Wintmalt and the c- fertilization variant (LAV+HAKOFYT extra) - 8,34 t per ha was the best one for Malwinta. In the second monitored year 2009/2010, the d-fertilization variant - 8,49 t per haseemed to be the best one for Wintmalt and the c-fertilization variant - 8,57 t per ha for the second monitored genotype (Malwinta). In both monitored years, the lowest yield for both monitored genotypes was reached in the non- fertilization variant - a. Chemical indicator - extraction which varied from 80.16 to 80.90 %.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean winter barley yield was 7.83 t per ha in 2008/2009.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
7.83 t per hae0
Qualifier
2008/2009e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Influence of diferend methods of fertilization on energy production of winter barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“The average yield reached 7.83 t per ha for 2008/2009 for both monitored genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–666 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean winter barley yield was 7.76 t per ha in 2009/2010.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Outcome
yielde1
Value
7.76 t per hae0
Qualifier
2009/2010e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“7.76 t per ha in 2009/2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–697 · show in text ↑
e1

“The average yield reached 7.83 t per ha for 2008/2009 for both monitored genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–666 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wintmalt yielded 0.15 t per ha less than Malwinta.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Material
Wintmalte0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
0.15 t per hae0
Qualifier
7.87 t per hae0
Comparator
Malwintae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Wintmalt reached lower yield of 0.15 t per ha if compared to Malwinta - 7.87 t per ha for both monitored years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wintmalt yield was highest under d-fertilization in 2008/2009, at 9.58 t per ha.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Material
Wintmalte0
Treatment
d-fertilization variant (NH4N03+HAK0FYT extra)e0
Outcome
fertilization variante0
Direction
beste0
Value
9.58 t per hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“In 2008/2009, the d-fertilization variant (NH4N03+HAK0FYT extra) - 9.58 t per ha was the best fertilization variant for Wintmalt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Malwinta yield was highest under c-fertilization in 2008/2009, at 8,34 t per ha.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Material
Malwintae0
Treatment
c- fertilization variant (LAV+HAKOFYT extra)e0
Outcome
fertilization variante0
Direction
beste0
Value
8,34 t per hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“the c- fertilization variant (LAV+HAKOFYT extra) - 8,34 t per ha was the best one for Malwinta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2009/2010, d-fertilization was best for Wintmalt at 8,49 t per ha.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Material
Wintmalte0
Treatment
d-fertilization variante0
Outcome
best onee0
Direction
beste0
Value
8,49 t per hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the second monitored year 2009/2010, the d-fertilization variant - 8,49 t per haseemed to be the best one for Wintmalt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2009/2010, c-fertilization was best for Malwinta at 8,57 t per ha.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Material
Malwintae0
Treatment
c-fertilization variante0
Outcome
genotypee0
Value
8,57 t per hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“the c-fertilization variant - 8,57 t per ha for the second monitored genotype (Malwinta)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The unfertilized variant produced the lowest yield for both genotypes in both years.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
non- fertilization variant - ae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
both monitored yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“In both monitored years, the lowest yield for both monitored genotypes was reached in the non- fertilization variant - a.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1377 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The extraction indicator ranged from 80.16 to 80.90%.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Outcome
extractione0
Value
80.16 to 80.90 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Chemical indicator - extraction which varied from 80.16 to 80.90 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1445 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this paper · 473 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.