Paper · 2002 · Agricultural Economics Research Review

Yield Gaps And Constraints In The Production of Rabi Sorghum In Karnataka - A Path Coefficient Analysis

G.M. Gaddi; S.M. Mundinamani; H. Basavaraj

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This paper is an attempt to estimate the magnitudes of yield gaps, causative factors and constrains for attaining greater farm potential in rabi sorghum production in Karnataka. Primary data were collected from 80 sample farms using the multistage random sampling technique. Data collected during 1996–97 were analysed using the IRRI methodology on yield gaps, path coefficient and tabular analyses. Results of the study revealed a magnitude of a total yield gap of 1454.20 kg/ha, which comprised of relatively higher yield gap-I (1013.47 kg/ha) than yield gap-II (441.06 kg/ha). Farmers realised 58.83 per cent of potential yield and 69.78 per cent of potential farm yield. Path coefficient analysis showed that sub optimal use of plant nutrients, human labour and bullock labour on farmers' field vis-a-vis demonstration plots were the major factors conditioning yield gap. Sub-standard and costly chemical fertilizer and plant nutrients, labor shortage, non-availability of desired variety seed, unfavorable climatic conditions and incidence of pest and diseases limited sorghum productivity on farmers' fields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total rabi sorghum yield gap was 1454.20 kg/ha.

Taxon
rabi sorghumt0
Outcome
total yield gape0
Value
1454.20 kg/hae0
Setting
Karnatakae1

Verbatim

t0

“rabi sorghum”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 48–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“a total yield gap of 1454.20 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–479 · show in text ↑
e1

“rabi sorghum production in Karnataka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–176 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield gap I was 1013.47 kg/ha, higher than yield gap II.

Taxon
rabi sorghumt0
Outcome
yield gap-Ie0
Direction
highere0
Value
1013.47 kg/hae0
Comparator
yield gap-IIe0

Verbatim

t0

“rabi sorghum”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 48–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“relatively higher yield gap-I (1013.47 kg/ha) than yield gap-II (441.06 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–578 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield gap II was 441.06 kg/ha.

Taxon
rabi sorghumt0
Outcome
yield gap-IIe0
Value
441.06 kg/hae0

Verbatim

t0

“rabi sorghum”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 48–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“yield gap-II (441.06 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–578 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers achieved 58.83 per cent of potential yield.

Taxon
rabi sorghumt0
Outcome
potential yielde0
Value
58.83 per cente0

Verbatim

t0

“rabi sorghum”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 48–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Farmers realised 58.83 per cent of potential yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–630 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers achieved 69.78 per cent of potential farm yield.

Taxon
rabi sorghumt0
Outcome
potential farm yielde0
Value
69.78 per cente0

Verbatim

t0

“rabi sorghum”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 48–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“69.78 per cent of potential farm yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–673 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Suboptimal plant nutrient use was a major factor in the yield gap.

Taxon
rabi sorghumt0
Treatment
sub optimal use of plant nutrientse0
Outcome
yield gape0
Comparator
demonstration plotse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“rabi sorghum”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 48–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“sub optimal use of plant nutrients, human labour and bullock labour on farmers' field vis-a-vis demonstration plots were the major factors conditioning yield gap”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–874 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Suboptimal human labour was a major factor in the yield gap.

Taxon
rabi sorghumt0
Treatment
human laboure0
Outcome
yield gape0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“rabi sorghum”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 48–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“sub optimal use of plant nutrients, human labour and bullock labour on farmers' field vis-a-vis demonstration plots were the major factors conditioning yield gap”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–874 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Suboptimal bullock labour was a major factor in the yield gap.

Taxon
rabi sorghumt0
Treatment
bullock laboure0
Outcome
yield gape0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“rabi sorghum”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 48–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“sub optimal use of plant nutrients, human labour and bullock labour on farmers' field vis-a-vis demonstration plots were the major factors conditioning yield gap”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–874 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Input quality and cost, labour shortage, seed availability, climate, pests, and diseases limited sorghum productivity.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Outcome
sorghum productivitye0
Direction
limitede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sub-standard and costly chemical fertilizer and plant nutrients, labor shortage, non-availability of desired variety seed, unfavorable climatic conditions and incidence of pest and diseases limited sorghum productivity on farmers' fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1113 · show in text ↑