Abstract
Mixtures of CDAA + atrazine or propazine applied preemergence gave excellent grass and non-grass weed control and no sorghum injury. Such mixtures offer promise of more consistent weed control than either component alone and less soil residue than a higher rate of atrazine or propazine alone.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Preemergence CDAA plus atrazine or propazine mixtures gave excellent grass and non-grass weed control in sorghum
- Treatment
- Mixtures of CDAA + atrazine or propazine applied preemergencee1
- Interactor
- grass and non-grass weede1weed
- Outcome
- grass and non-grass weed controle1
- Direction
- excellente1
SorghumNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Mixtures of CDAA + atrazine or propazine applied preemergence gave excellent grass and non-grass weed control and no sorghum injury”
Claim · model-written summary
Preemergence CDAA plus atrazine or propazine mixtures caused no injury to sorghum
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Mixtures of CDAA + atrazine or propazine applied preemergence gave excellent grass and non-grass weed control and no sorghum injury”
Claim · model-written summary
Such mixtures offer promise of more consistent weed control than either component alone
- Treatment
- Such mixturese2
- Outcome
- weed controle2
- Direction
- more consistente2
- Comparator
- either component alonee2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Mixtures of CDAA + atrazine or propazine applied preemergence gave excellent grass and non-grass weed control and no sorghum injury”
e2“Such mixtures offer promise of more consistent weed control than either component alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Such mixtures offer promise of less soil residue than a higher rate of atrazine or propazine alone
- Treatment
- Such mixturese2
- Outcome
- soil residuee3
- Direction
- lesse3
- Comparator
- a higher rate of atrazine or propazine alonee3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Mixtures of CDAA + atrazine or propazine applied preemergence gave excellent grass and non-grass weed control and no sorghum injury”
e2“Such mixtures offer promise of more consistent weed control than either component alone”
e3“less soil residue than a higher rate of atrazine or propazine alone”
The same questions in other papers
atrazine · crop injury · SorghumPositive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →propazine · weed · SorghumResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
atrazine · weed · SorghumResults agree
19 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →herbicide · crop injury · SorghumPositive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →herbicide · weed · SorghumPositive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.