Paper · 1976

Sulfur-coated urea versus urea and ammonium nitrate as a nitrogen source for grain sorghum

G. M. Prine

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In field trials on Kanapaha fine sand at Gainesville, Florida in 1970-2, grain sorghum cv. Bird-Go and BR-64 was given 78, 157 or 313 kg N/ha as sulphur-coated urea (SCU), ammonium nitrate or urea or 470 kg N/ha as SCU. An unfertilized winter crop of rye or ryegrass was used to measure residual N each season. Sorghum grain and silage yields were not significantly affected by either N source or date of application of N (all at sowing or part at sowing and part as side-dressing); average annual grain yield for all application rates and dates was 4.31 t/ha for ammonium nitrate, 4.38 t for SCU and 4.44 t for urea. Increasing the N rate above 157 kg/ha did not significantly increase yields and the 470 kg N/ha rate was toxic to seedlings. SCU furnished more residual N to winter rye and ryegrass than did the other sources at high N rates but this seemed to be of little practical value at normal rates of applied N. Drastic reductions were noted in the pH and the Ca, Mg and K contents of the soil at the end of the 3-year period for the 470 kg N/ha rate of SCU

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen source and timing did not significantly affect sorghum grain and silage yield.

Taxon
SorghumSorghume0
Treatment
N source or date of application of Ne0
Outcome
grain and silage yieldse0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum grain and silage yields were not significantly affected by either N source or date of application of N (all at sowing or part at sowing and part as side-dressing)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen above 157 kg/ha did not significantly raise yield.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
N rate above 157 kg/hae0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
did not significantly increasee0
Comparator
157 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the N rate above 157 kg/ha did not significantly increase yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SCU at 470 kg N/ha was toxic to seedlings.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
470 kg N/hae0
Outcome
toxic to seedlingse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 470 kg N/ha rate was toxic to seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–741 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high rates SCU left more residual nitrogen for winter rye and ryegrass than other N sources.

Treatment
SCUe0
Outcome
residual Ne0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
the other sourcese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SCU furnished more residual N to winter rye and ryegrass than did the other sources at high N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High rate SCU reduced soil pH and Ca, Mg and K content over three years.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
470 kg N/ha rate of SCUe0
Outcome
pH and the Ca, Mg and K contents of the soile0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drastic reductions were noted in the pH and the Ca, Mg and K contents of the soil at the end of the 3-year period for the 470 kg N/ha rate of SCU”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1066 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results differ

100 papers: 80 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 80 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

nitrogen · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

290 papers: 264 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 264 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

286 papers more in this group

See all 290 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.