Paper · 2012 · WIT transactions on ecology and the environment

Response of leaf, non-leaf yield characters and plant fraction interrelationship of indigenous wild cucumberCucumis myriocarpusto varying irrigation intervals and NPK fertilizer rates

R. J. Nkgapele; M. S. Mphosi; K. G. Shadung

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Wild-cucumber, Cucumis myriocarpus, is among the most important indigenous crop plants in rural Limpopo Province of South Africa, primarily used as an ethno-botanical crop and a leafy green vegetable. An experiment laid out in a split-plot design and replicated three times was conducted to study the effects of irrigation frequency (2, 4 and 6 day interval) and NPK fertilizer rate (0 Kg NPK ha -1 , 60-40-20 kg NPK ha -1 , 120-80-40 kg NPK ha -1 and 180-120-60 kg NPK ha -1 ) on leaf and non-leaf yield characters and plant fraction interrelationships of Cucumis myriocarpus. The intermediate treatment of four day irrigation interval and 120-80-40 kg NPK ha -1 application rate produced significantly higher (P < 0.05) leaf and non-leaf yield characters than the extreme treatments of short two day irrigation intervals and low 60-40-20 kg NPK ha -1 ; and long six day irrigation intervals and 180-120-60 kg NPK ha -1 . Only fresh plant fraction interrelationships were significant. In conclusion, the results of the study indicate that Cucumis myriocarpus can be successfully grown using conventional production methods and supply rural households with good yields of a leafy green vegetable as well as providing raw materials needed for ethnobotanical purposes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Four-day irrigation and 120-80-40 kg NPK ha -1 gave significantly higher leaf and non-leaf yield than extreme treatments.

Taxon
Cucumis myriocarpusCucumis myriocarpust0
Treatment
four day irrigation interval and 120-80-40 kg NPK ha -1e0
Outcome
leaf and non-leaf yield characterse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
short two day irrigation intervals and low 60-40-20 kg NPK ha -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis myriocarpus
Cucumis myriocarpus · TaxonGolden-elm · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumis myriocarpus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“The intermediate treatment of four day irrigation interval and 120-80-40 kg NPK ha -1 application rate produced significantly higher (P < 0.05) leaf and non-leaf yield characters than the extreme treatments of short two day irrigation intervals and low 60-40-20 kg NPK ha -1 ; and long six day irrigation intervals and 180-120-60 kg NPK ha -1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–922 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Only fresh plant fraction interrelationships were significant.

Taxon
Cucumis myriocarpusCucumis myriocarpust0
Organ / stage
fresh plant fractione0
Outcome
fresh plant fraction interrelationshipse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis myriocarpus
Cucumis myriocarpus · TaxonGolden-elm · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumis myriocarpus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Only fresh plant fraction interrelationships were significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–985 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Cucumis myriocarpusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.