Paper · 1995 · Environmental Entomology

Parasitism and Disease Incidence in the Green Cloverworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Strip-Intercropped Soybean Agroecosystems

Charles E. Williams; Daniel M. Pavuk; Douglas H. Taylor; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

We examined the effects of strip-intercropping soybean, Glycine max, and sorghum, Sorghum bicolor, on rates of insect parasitism and fungal disease incidence in larvae of the green cloverworm, Plathypena scabra (F.), a widespread and occasionally serious pest of soybeans, during an endemic year. A completely randomized design with two cropping systems (monocropped soybean and soybean intercropped with sorghum), two sorghum heights (dwarf sorghum ≈1 m in height; tall sorghum ≈2 m in height), and two row patterns (2 rows of sorghum alternating with 10 rows of soybean; 6 rows of sorghum alternating with 6 rows of soybean) was used. Abundance (number per row-meter) of P. scabra larvae, rates of larval parasitism and incidence of the entomopathogenic fungus, Nomuraea rileyi (Farlow) Sampson did not differ significantly among treatments or their interaction. Soybean yield (grams dry weight of beans per row-meter) did not differ significantly among treatments but sorghum grain yield and biomass (grams dry weight per row-meter) were significantly lower in dwarf sorghum planted in wide rows because of competing weed populations. Results suggest that neither the accrual of P. scabra larvae in soybean nor the impact of the parasitoid-pathogen complex on P. scabra mortality is affected by structural or taxonomic agroecosystem diversification at the scale studied. n

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Green cloverworm larval abundance did not differ significantly among cropping treatments.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
soybean intercropped with sorghume1
Interactor
P. scabrae0pest
Outcome
Abundance (number per row-meter) of P. scabra larvaee0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
monocropped soybeane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Abundance (number per row-meter) of P. scabra larvae, rates of larval parasitism and incidence of the entomopathogenic fungus, Nomuraea rileyi (Farlow) Sampson did not differ significantly among treatments or their interaction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–864 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 104–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“monocropped soybean and soybean intercropped with sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Green cloverworm larval parasitism rates did not differ significantly among treatments.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
soybean intercropped with sorghume1
Interactor
Plathypena scabrae2pest
Outcome
rates of larval parasitisme0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
monocropped soybeane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rates of larval parasitism and incidence of the entomopathogenic fungus, Nomuraea rileyi (Farlow) Sampson did not differ significantly among treatments or their interaction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–864 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 104–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“monocropped soybean and soybean intercropped with sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–412 · show in text ↑
e2

“larvae of the green cloverworm, Plathypena scabra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–210 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yield did not differ significantly among treatments.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
soybean intercropped with sorghume1
Outcome
Soybean yielde0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
monocropped soybeane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean yield (grams dry weight of beans per row-meter) did not differ significantly among treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–966 · show in text ↑
e1

“monocropped soybean and soybean intercropped with sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dwarf sorghum planted in wide rows had significantly lower grain yield because of competing weeds.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
dwarf sorghum planted in wide rowse0
Interactor
weed populationse0weed
Outcome
sorghum grain yielde0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sorghum grain yield and biomass (grams dry weight per row-meter) were significantly lower in dwarf sorghum planted in wide rows because of competing weed populations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dwarf sorghum planted in wide rows had significantly lower biomass because of competing weeds.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
dwarf sorghum planted in wide rowse0
Interactor
weed populationse0weed
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sorghum grain yield and biomass (grams dry weight per row-meter) were significantly lower in dwarf sorghum planted in wide rows because of competing weed populations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1137 · show in text ↑

Sorghum · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Sorghum · pest · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · pest · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

intercropping · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

218 papers: 131 positive, 87 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 131 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

214 papers more in this group

See all 218 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.