Paper · 1978 · The American Midland Naturalist

Effects of Stand Composition on Insect Visitation in Two-Species Mixtures of Hieracium

James D. Thomson

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
180
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

I investigated the effects of host plant distribution on the host plant choice of flower-visiting insects in mixed stands of the hawkweeds Hieracium aurantiacum L. and H. florentinum All. The way in which pollinators divide their visits among simultaneously blooming plant species determines the outcome of plant competition for pollinators, which may affect community structure. Although the hawkweeds are apomictic, these stands are simple communities that embody many of the assumptions of published models concerning the effects of stand composition on insect foraging. Existing theory suggests that visitation on one of two competing species should increase with its proportion in the stand. Visitation on H. aurantiacum follows this relationship, but H. florentinum receives more visits with H. aurantiacum present than when it blooms alone. Extension of this result to other, non-apomictic species implies that a species may occasionally be benefitted by the presence of an apparent competitor. I propose a tentative explanation based on pollinator inconstancy and foraging habitat selection, and suggest some possible effects of these phenomena on community structure.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insect visitation to H. aurantiacum increases with its proportion in mixed stands.

Taxon
H. aurantiacumPilosella aurantiacae0
Outcome
Visitatione0
Direction
increasee1
Setting
stande1

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pilosella aurantiaca
Pilosella aurantiaca · TaxonJörg Hempel · CC BY-SA 3.0 de · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Visitation on H. aurantiacum follows this relationship”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–751 · show in text ↑
e1

“visitation on one of two competing species should increase with its proportion in the stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–695 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H. florentinum receives more visits when H. aurantiacum is present than when alone.

Taxon
H. florentinume0
Interactor
H. aurantiacumPilosella aurantiacae0other
Outcome
visitse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
when it blooms alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pilosella aurantiaca
Pilosella aurantiaca · InteractorJörg Hempel · CC BY-SA 3.0 de · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“H. florentinum receives more visits with H. aurantiacum present than when it blooms alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–847 · show in text ↑