Paper · 1986 · The Canadian Entomologist

NATIVE PREDATORS AND THE CONTROL OF POTATO APHIDS

Gilles Boiteau

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
19
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Experiments were done in fields of potato in Fredericton, New Brunswick, in 1981, 1982, and 1984 to determine the effect of native predators on the abundance of aphids. The populations of predators were altered by pitfall trapping within plots enclosed by polythene barriers and by applying a selective insecticide. The abundance of aphids was monitored in the enclosed plots and in unenclosed areas serving as control. The experimental design was successful at significantly reducing the numbers of Carabidae in the enclosures compared with the open plots. Aphid populations tended to be larger in the plots with depleted populations of Carabidae than in the control areas and were significantly larger in the plots where the insecticide depleted the populations of canopy level predators. These results suggest that the Carabidae play a relatively minor role in aphid control on the potato crop compared with specific predators.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Enclosures with pitfall trapping significantly reduced Carabidae numbers compared with open plots.

Treatment
pitfall trapping within plots enclosed by polythene barrierse2
Interactor
CarabidaeCarabidaee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
numbers of Carabidaee1
Direction
reducinge1
Comparator
open plotse1
Setting
Fredericton, New Brunswicke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiments were done in fields of potato in Fredericton, New Brunswick, in 1981, 1982, and 1984”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“The experimental design was successful at significantly reducing the numbers of Carabidae in the enclosures compared with the open plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–565 · show in text ↑
e2

“The populations of predators were altered by pitfall trapping within plots enclosed by polythene barriers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphid populations tended to be larger in plots with depleted Carabidae than in control areas.

Treatment
depleted populations of Carabidaee3
Interactor
aphide3pest
Second interactor
CarabidaeCarabidaee3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Aphid populationse3
Direction
largere3
Comparator
control arease3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiments were done in fields of potato in Fredericton, New Brunswick, in 1981, 1982, and 1984”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–105 · show in text ↑
e3

“Aphid populations tended to be larger in the plots with depleted populations of Carabidae than in the control areas and were significantly larger in the plots where the insecticide depleted the populations of canopy level predators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide depletion of canopy-level predators significantly increased aphid populations compared with control areas.

Treatment
insecticidee3
Interactor
aphide3pest
Second interactor
canopy level predatorse3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Aphid populationse3
Direction
largere3
Comparator
control arease3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiments were done in fields of potato in Fredericton, New Brunswick, in 1981, 1982, and 1984”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–105 · show in text ↑
e3

“Aphid populations tended to be larger in the plots with depleted populations of Carabidae than in the control areas and were significantly larger in the plots where the insecticide depleted the populations of canopy level predators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–798 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carabidae play a relatively minor role in aphid control on the potato crop compared with specific predators.

Taxon
potato cropSolanum tuberosume4
Interactor
CarabidaeCarabidaee4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
role in aphid controle4
Comparator
specific predatorse4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“These results suggest that the Carabidae play a relatively minor role in aphid control on the potato crop compared with specific predators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–938 · show in text ↑

insecticide · pest · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 20 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.