Paper · 2010 · Pakistan Journal of Botany

Impact of plant populations and nitrogen levels on maize.

Muhammad Arif; M. T. Jan; Naqib Ullah Khan; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
22
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To study the impact of plant population and nitrogen levels on maize, an experiment was conducted at KPK Agricultural University, Peshawar, Pakistan during summer 2006.The experiment was carried out in randomized complete block (RCB) design with split plot arrangement having four replications. Plant populations (4, 6 and 8 plants m -2 ) were kept in the main plots while nitrogen levels (0, 100, 130 and 160 kg ha -1 ) were allotted to the subplots. The size of each subplot was 3 m × 5 m (15m 2 ) with row to row distance of 75cm. Azam variety was sown at the seed rate of 40 kg ha -1 . The required plant population i.e., 4, 6 and 8 plants m -2 were maintained by thinning after emergence. Ears m -2 , grain yield and biological yield consistently increased with increase in plant density from 4 to 8 plants m -2 . However, grains ear -1 and thousand grain weight lessened with increase in plant density. Harvest index declined with increase in plant density but harvest index of plant densities of 4 and 6 plants m -2 was statistically at par with each other. Ears m -2 , grains ear -1 , thousand grain weight, grain yield, biological yield and harvest index constantly improved with increasing level of N. Likewise, ears m -2 , grains ear -1 , thousand grain weight, grain yield, biological yield and harvest index were higher at the highest level of N. The plant density × nitrogen interactions for ears m -2 , grains ear -1 and grain yield were significant. Ears m -2 , grains ear -1 and grain yield continually enhanced with increase in N level from 0 to 160 kg ha -1 at all plant densities. It was concluded that the highest plant population of 8 plants m -2 and the highest N level of 160 kg ha -1 resulted in higher yield of maize.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ears per m2, grain yield and biological yield of maize increased consistently as plant density rose from 4 to 8 plants per m2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
plant density from 4 to 8 plants m -2e0
Outcome
Ears m -2 , grain yield and biological yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ears m -2 , grain yield and biological yield consistently increased with increase in plant density from 4 to 8 plants m -2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grains per ear and thousand grain weight of maize decreased with increasing plant density.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
plant densitye0
Outcome
grains ear -1 and thousand grain weighte0
Direction
lessenede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grains ear -1 and thousand grain weight lessened with increase in plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index of maize declined with increasing plant density.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
plant densitye0
Outcome
Harvest indexe0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvest index declined with increase in plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index at plant densities of 4 and 6 plants per m2 was statistically at par.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
plant densities of 4 and 6 plants m -2e0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harvest index of plant densities of 4 and 6 plants m -2 was statistically at par with each other”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ears per m2, grains per ear and thousand grain weight of maize improved with increasing N level.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
increasing level of Ne0
Outcome
Ears m -2 , grains ear -1 , thousand grain weighte0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ears m -2 , grains ear -1 , thousand grain weight, grain yield, biological yield and harvest index constantly improved with increasing level of N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1210 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield, biological yield and harvest index of maize improved with increasing N level.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
increasing level of Ne0
Outcome
grain yield, biological yield and harvest indexe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ears m -2 , grains ear -1 , thousand grain weight, grain yield, biological yield and harvest index constantly improved with increasing level of N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1210 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The plant density by nitrogen interactions for ears per m2, grains per ear and grain yield were significant.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
plant density × nitrogen interactionse0
Outcome
ears m -2 , grains ear -1 and grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant density × nitrogen interactions for ears m -2 , grains ear -1 and grain yield were significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1464 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ears per m2, grains per ear and grain yield of maize continually increased with N from 0 to 160 kg per ha at all plant densities.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
N level from 0 to 160 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
Ears m -2 , grains ear -1 and grain yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
at all plant densitiese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ears m -2 , grains ear -1 and grain yield continually enhanced with increase in N level from 0 to 160 kg ha -1 at all plant densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1599 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that the highest plant population of 8 plants per m2 together with the highest N level of 160 kg per ha gave higher maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
highest plant population of 8 plants m -2 and the highest N level of 160 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
higher yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was concluded that the highest plant population of 8 plants m -2 and the highest N level of 160 kg ha -1 resulted in higher yield of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1601–1742 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

658 papers: 519 positive, 139 negative or no effect

518 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

654 papers more in this group

See all 658 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.