Paper · 1954 · Japanese Journal of Phytopathology

A proposed method for estimating loss in yield of wheat caused by take-all (Ophiobolus graminis SACC.)

Heiji TASUGI; Kan NAKAYA; Naoji SUZUKI

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

During the seven year period (1943∼49), take-all disease of wheat and barley was quite severe, presumably predisposed by insufficient manuring during and after the war. The outbreak in 1948 was most severe and widespread. This study was undertaken to find out a method available for estimating the loss in yield, 20 to 30 days before harvest, of wheat infected by take-all. A naturally infected wheat field of 0.7 acre in area was divided into 20 plots, a row of 180cm length was chosen at random in each plot, and wheat plants on the row were sampled. The average culm lengths, the total numbers of culms, the total grain yields, and the weight of thousand grains of these 20 samples were recorded (Table 1). As shown in Fig. 2, it was found that there was a linear relation between the average culm length and the grain yield of each sample. The degrees of disease severity, as expressed by the decrease in culm length and grain yield, could be classified into three distinct groups, viz., none or light, moderate, and heavy. The indices of average grain yields of these groups were 100, 70, and 45, and those of the corresponding average culm lengths were 100, 90, and 60 respectively. This may be due to the fact that optimum infection usually occurs twice in a growth period of wheat, viz., in autumn and in early spring; the earlier the infection occurs, the heavier is the damage. No clear difference in grain yield was found betwee“none” and“light”groups. The possibility of estimating the loss in yield for the whole area of affected field by applying the regression line of grain yield. on culm length was discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat culm length and grain yield had a linear relation across samples.

Organ / stage
culme0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Qualifier
linear relatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was a linear relation between the average culm length and the grain yield of each sample”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–842 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate disease severity had a mean grain-yield index of 70, versus 100 for none or light severity.

Outcome
average grain yieldse0
Value
70e0
Qualifier
moderatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The degrees of disease severity, as expressed by the decrease in culm length and grain yield, could be classified into three distinct groups, viz., none or light, moderate, and heavy. The indices of average grain yields of these groups were 100, 70, and 45”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy disease severity had a mean grain-yield index of 45.

Outcome
average grain yieldse0
Value
45e0
Qualifier
heavye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The degrees of disease severity, as expressed by the decrease in culm length and grain yield, could be classified into three distinct groups, viz., none or light, moderate, and heavy. The indices of average grain yields of these groups were 100, 70, and 45”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate disease severity had a mean culm-length index of 90.

Outcome
average culm lengthse0
Value
90e0
Qualifier
moderatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The degrees of disease severity, as expressed by the decrease in culm length and grain yield, could be classified into three distinct groups, viz., none or light, moderate, and heavy. The indices of average grain yields of these groups were 100, 70, and 45, and those of the corresponding average culm lengths were 100, 90, and 60 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy disease severity had a mean culm-length index of 60.

Outcome
average culm lengthse0
Value
60e0
Qualifier
heavye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The degrees of disease severity, as expressed by the decrease in culm length and grain yield, could be classified into three distinct groups, viz., none or light, moderate, and heavy. The indices of average grain yields of these groups were 100, 70, and 45, and those of the corresponding average culm lengths were 100, 90, and 60 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield showed no clear difference between the none and light disease groups.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
No clear differencee0
Comparator
betwee“none” and“light”groupse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No clear difference in grain yield was found betwee“none” and“light”groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1462 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑