Paper · 1964 · Annals of Botany

An Improvement in the Raggio Technique for Obtaining Nodules on Excised Roots of Phaseolus vulgaris L. in Culture

A. H. Bunting; J. Horrocks

2
claims
7
verbatim quotes
15
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Improvements are reported in the Raggio technique (e.g. Barrios, Raggio, and Raggio, 1963) for producing nodules on explants of roots excised from seedlings of Phaseolus vulgaris and grown in sterile culture. The principal modification is the inclusion of a portion of the hypocotyl in the explant. In a factorial experiment testing also seed size, germination temperature, and size of seedling at the time the explant was taken, the number of nodules formed was increased in this way from an average of 0·6 to around 12 per explant, and the largest number obtained was 35; without the piece of hypocotyl the largest number of nodules was 3 per explant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Including a portion of the hypocotyl in the explant increased nodule number per explant to around 12.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
inclusion of a portion of the hypocotyl in the explante2
Outcome
number of nodules formede4
Direction
increasede4
Value
around 12 per explante4
Comparator
without the piece of hypocotyle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“producing nodules on explants of roots excised from seedlings of Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–178 · show in text ↑
e2

“The principal modification is the inclusion of a portion of the hypocotyl in the explant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–297 · show in text ↑
e4

“the number of nodules formed was increased in this way from an average of 0·6 to around 12 per explant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–532 · show in text ↑
e5

“the largest number obtained was 35; without the piece of hypocotyl the largest number of nodules was 3 per explant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The largest nodule number per explant was higher with a hypocotyl piece (35) than without it (3).

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
inclusion of a portion of the hypocotyl in the explante2
Outcome
largest number of nodulese5
Direction
higherinferrede5
Value
35e5
Comparator
without the piece of hypocotyle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“producing nodules on explants of roots excised from seedlings of Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–178 · show in text ↑
e2

“The principal modification is the inclusion of a portion of the hypocotyl in the explant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–297 · show in text ↑
e5

“the largest number obtained was 35; without the piece of hypocotyl the largest number of nodules was 3 per explant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–652 · show in text ↑

in vitro · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.