Paper · 1988 · Annals of Botany

Representing Cumulative Germination. 1. A Critical Analysis of Single-value Germination Indices

R. F. BROWN; D. G. MAYER

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
101
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Several single-value germination indices, including Kotowski's coefficient of velocity, Maguire's speed of germination, Czabator's germination value, Diavanshir and Pourbiek's germination value, Timson's cumulative germination, Lehle and Putnam's Richards function index, Smith and Millett's sprouting index, and Tucker and Wright's regression index, were evaluated to test their ability to distinguish superior from inferior germination. All except Timson's cumulative germination method were essentially no better for ranking germination responses than data on total germination; Kotowski's coefficient of velocity, Smith and Millet's sprouting index, and Lehle and Putnam's Richards function index were markedly inferior. Because of the ambiguity inherent in any index that combines, into a single value, data about the onset, rate and extent of germination, none of the indices could be recommended as a way of summarizing germination.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All indices except Timson’s method ranked germination no better than total germination data.

Outcome
ranking germination responsese0
Direction
no bettere0
Comparator
data on total germinatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“All except Timson's cumulative germination method were essentially no better for ranking germination responses than data on total germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–580 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three indices were markedly inferior for ranking germination.

Outcome
markedly inferiore0
Direction
markedly inferiore0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“Kotowski's coefficient of velocity, Smith and Millet's sprouting index, and Lehle and Putnam's Richards function index were markedly inferior”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–723 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors do not recommend any single-value germination index for summarizing germination.

Outcome
none of the indices could be recommendede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“none of the indices could be recommended as a way of summarizing germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–938 · show in text ↑