Paper · 1984 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Impact of Acyrthosiphon kondoi (Homoptera: Aphididae) on Alfalfa: Field and Greenhouse Studies

C. G. Summers; R. L. Coviello

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Damage to alfalfa by Acyrthosiphon kondoi Shinji depended on the number of aphids per stem and the length of infestation. In field studies, first-harvest yields were not significantly reduced at populations of 87 aphids per stem, if they were controlled immediately. However, delaying control as few as 8 days at this infestation level resulted in significant yield reductions. These data expand on previous work and set upper levels for aphid infestation. There was no yield loss in the second or third harvest, indicating that no effects carried over from damage sustained before the first harvest. In greenhouse studies, plants subjected to a heavy aphid infestation produced significantly more leaf dry matter but were significantly shorter than noninfested plants. There was no significant difference in quality, as determined by the percentage of protein and total digestible nutrients, between infested and noninfested plants in either the field or greenhouse study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphid damage depended on aphid number per stem and infestation duration.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
length of infestatione0
Interactor
Acyrthosiphon kondoi ShinjiAcyrthosiphon kondoie0pest
Outcome
Damage to alfalfae0
Qualifier
number of aphids per stem and the length of infestatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Acyrthosiphon kondoi
Acyrthosiphon kondoi · InteractorJesse Rorabaugh · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Damage to alfalfa by Acyrthosiphon kondoi Shinji depended on the number of aphids per stem and the length of infestation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Immediate control at 87 aphids per stem did not significantly reduce first-harvest yield.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
controlled immediatelye0
Outcome
first-harvest yieldse0
Direction
not significantly reducede0
Value
87 aphids per steme0
Setting
field studiese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In field studies, first-harvest yields were not significantly reduced at populations of 87 aphids per stem, if they were controlled immediately.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

An eight-day control delay at this infestation level significantly reduced yield.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
delaying control as few as 8 dayse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“delaying control as few as 8 days at this infestation level resulted in significant yield reductions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second- and third-harvest yields showed no carryover loss.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
yield loss in the second or third harveste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no yield loss in the second or third harvest, indicating that no effects carried over from damage sustained before the first harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–600 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy aphid infestation increased leaf dry matter in the greenhouse.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
heavy aphid infestatione0
Outcome
leaf dry mattere0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
noninfested plantse0
Setting
greenhouse studiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In greenhouse studies, plants subjected to a heavy aphid infestation produced significantly more leaf dry matter but were significantly shorter than noninfested plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy aphid infestation made greenhouse plants shorter.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
heavy aphid infestatione0
Outcome
shortere0
Direction
shortere0
Comparator
noninfested plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In greenhouse studies, plants subjected to a heavy aphid infestation produced significantly more leaf dry matter but were significantly shorter than noninfested plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Infested and noninfested plants did not differ significantly in protein percentage or total digestible nutrients.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
infestede0
Outcome
percentage of protein and total digestible nutrientse0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
noninfested plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference in quality, as determined by the percentage of protein and total digestible nutrients, between infested and noninfested plants in either the field or greenhouse study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑

infection · quality: protein · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

infection · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 3 positive, 15 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.