Paper · 1992 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Response of Cotton to Damage by Insect Pests in Australia: Pest Management Trials

K. D. Brook; A. B. Hearn; C. F. Kelly

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Twenty pest management experiments were done between 1985 and 1988 at 11 sites in the Namoi valley of NSW, Australia, on four varieties of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. In every experiment, the control treatment, consisting of the standard action thresholds for the common insect pests of the region, was compared with higher earlyseason thresholds. Lower thresholds were tested at one site for three seasons and at three other sites for the last season. The Australian-bred okra leaf variety Siokra consistently outyielded normal leaf variety DP90 and required fewer sprays. ‘Siokra’, with higher early season pest thresholds, had yields similar to or better than the control treatment. DP90 compensated less for early-season damage and was therefore more susceptible to earlyseason damage than ‘Siokra’, often resulting in a lower yield for the treatments with higher thresholds. There was no threshold treatment that was always the best, but there was a trend for treatments with higher early-season thresholds to be more profitable than the control with the Australian varieties ‘Siokra’ and ‘Sicala’, but not with ‘DP90’, Higher thresholds early in the season, and the resultant less stringent pest control, did not consistently delay the crop or lead to more late-season applications of costly insecticides. The less exhaustively tested treatment with low thresholds always yielded well. It was the most profitable only 1 yr in 3 with Siokra but 2 yr in 3 with ‘DP90’.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Siokra consistently outyielded DP90.

Material
Siokrae0
Outcome
outyieldede0
Direction
outyieldede0
Comparator
DP90e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Australian-bred okra leaf variety Siokra consistently outyielded normal leaf variety DP90 and required fewer sprays.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–575 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Siokra required fewer sprays than DP90.

Material
Siokrae0
Outcome
sprayse0
Direction
fewere0
Comparator
DP90e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Australian-bred okra leaf variety Siokra consistently outyielded normal leaf variety DP90 and required fewer sprays.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–575 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Siokra with higher early season pest thresholds yielded similarly to or better than the control.

Material
‘Siokra’e0
Treatment
higher early season pest thresholdse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
similar to or bettere0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Siokra’, with higher early season pest thresholds, had yields similar to or better than the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DP90 compensated less for early season damage than Siokra.

Material
DP90e0
Outcome
compensatede0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
‘Siokra’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DP90 compensated less for early-season damage and was therefore more susceptible to earlyseason damage than ‘Siokra’, often resulting in a lower yield for the treatments with higher thresholds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DP90 often yielded less under higher thresholds.

Material
DP90e0
Treatment
higher thresholdse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
‘Siokra’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DP90 compensated less for early-season damage and was therefore more susceptible to earlyseason damage than ‘Siokra’, often resulting in a lower yield for the treatments with higher thresholds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No pest threshold treatment was always best.

Outcome
no threshold treatment that was always the beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no threshold treatment that was always the best, but there was a trend for treatments with higher early-season thresholds to be more profitable than the control with the Australian varieties ‘Siokra’ and ‘Sicala’, but not with ‘DP90’,”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher early season thresholds tended to be more profitable than control for Siokra and Sicala.

Material
‘Siokra’ and ‘Sicala’e0
Treatment
higher early-season thresholdse0
Outcome
more profitablee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no threshold treatment that was always the best, but there was a trend for treatments with higher early-season thresholds to be more profitable than the control with the Australian varieties ‘Siokra’ and ‘Sicala’, but not with ‘DP90’,”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The profitability trend under higher thresholds did not hold for DP90.

Material
‘DP90’e0
Treatment
higher early-season thresholdse0
Outcome
more profitablee0
Direction
note0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no threshold treatment that was always the best, but there was a trend for treatments with higher early-season thresholds to be more profitable than the control with the Australian varieties ‘Siokra’ and ‘Sicala’, but not with ‘DP90’,”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher early season thresholds did not consistently delay the crop.

Treatment
Higher thresholds early in the seasone0
Outcome
delay the crope0
Direction
did not consistentlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher thresholds early in the season, and the resultant less stringent pest control, did not consistently delay the crop or lead to more late-season applications of costly insecticides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1313 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher early season thresholds did not consistently increase late season insecticide applications.

Treatment
Higher thresholds early in the seasone0
Outcome
late-season applications of costly insecticidese0
Direction
did not consistentlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher thresholds early in the season, and the resultant less stringent pest control, did not consistently delay the crop or lead to more late-season applications of costly insecticides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1313 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low thresholds always yielded well.

Treatment
low thresholdse0
Outcome
yielded welle0
Direction
welle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The less exhaustively tested treatment with low thresholds always yielded well.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1393 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low thresholds were most profitable in 1 year out of 3 for Siokra.

Material
Siokrae0
Outcome
most profitablee0
Value
1 yr in 3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was the most profitable only 1 yr in 3 with Siokra but 2 yr in 3 with ‘DP90’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low thresholds were most profitable in 2 years out of 3 for DP90.

Material
‘DP90’e0
Outcome
most profitablee0
Value
2 yr in 3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was the most profitable only 1 yr in 3 with Siokra but 2 yr in 3 with ‘DP90’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑

climate site · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

climate site · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 18 positive, 23 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.