Paper · 2016 · Planta Daninha

Glyphosate Herbicide Use in Urochloa brizantha Management in Intercropping With Herbicide-Resistant Maize

D.V. SILVA; M.A.M. FREITAS; M.F. SOUZA; et al.

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The success of the intercropping among cultivated species depends on the adoption of practices that provide, in due course, greater competitive ability of a species over another. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of glyphosate herbicide in the suppression of Brachiaria (signalgrass) intercropped with maize. The experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with four replications. The treatments were arranged in a 5 x 2 + 2 factorial arrangement, the first factor corresponding to the doses of glyphosate (48, 96, 144, 240, 480 g ha-1 of the acid equivalent (a.e)) and the second one to the vegetative stages of the signalgrass at the time of application (2 and 4 tillers). Two controls were added to the treatment list, comprising controls without herbicide application and hand removal of the signalgrass. The number of plants, tillers and dry matter of signalgrass was reduced with glyphosate. The increase of the glyphosate doses enhanced the injure to the forage plants, mainly when the compound was sprayed at the two-tiller vegetative stage. The dry matter of maize plants increased proportionally to the glyphosate dose. However, the height of the maize plants was not affected. The grain mass and productivity of maize grain increased with increasing dose of glyphosate. The maize yield was negatively influenced on the untreated control. Glyphosate at 96 and 144 g ha-1, when applied at 2 and 4 tiller stage, respectively, reduces the growth of signalgrass and does not affect the maize grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate reduced the number of plants, tillers and dry matter of signalgrass compared with controls without herbicide.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
glyphosatee1
Interactor
signalgrasse1weed
Outcome
number of plants, tillers and dry matter of signalgrasse1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
controls without herbicide applicatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Herbicide-Resistant Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“The number of plants, tillers and dry matter of signalgrass was reduced with glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–933 · show in text ↑
e2

“Two controls were added to the treatment list, comprising controls without herbicide application and hand removal of the signalgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing glyphosate doses enhanced injury to the forage plants, mainly when sprayed at the two-tiller vegetative stage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
two-tiller vegetative stagee3
Treatment
increase of the glyphosate dosese3
Outcome
injure to the forage plantse3
Direction
enhancede3
Qualifier
mainly when the compound was sprayed at the two-tiller vegetative stagee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Herbicide-Resistant Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–105 · show in text ↑
e3

“The increase of the glyphosate doses enhanced the injure to the forage plants, mainly when the compound was sprayed at the two-tiller vegetative stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter of maize plants increased proportionally with glyphosate dose.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
glyphosate dosee4
Outcome
dry matter of maize plantse4
Direction
increased proportionallye4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Herbicide-Resistant Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–105 · show in text ↑
e4

“The dry matter of maize plants increased proportionally to the glyphosate dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate did not affect the height of maize plants.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
glyphosate dosese3
Outcome
height of the maize plantse5
Direction
not affectede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Herbicide-Resistant Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–105 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, the height of the maize plants was not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1223 · show in text ↑
e3

“The increase of the glyphosate doses enhanced the injure to the forage plants, mainly when the compound was sprayed at the two-tiller vegetative stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain mass and productivity of maize grain increased with increasing glyphosate dose.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
increasing dose of glyphosatee6
Outcome
grain mass and productivity of maize graine6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Herbicide-Resistant Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–105 · show in text ↑
e6

“The grain mass and productivity of maize grain increased with increasing dose of glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield was negatively influenced on the untreated control compared with glyphosate treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
glyphosatee1
Outcome
maize yielde7
Direction
negatively influencede7
Comparator
untreated controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Herbicide-Resistant Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–105 · show in text ↑
e7

“The maize yield was negatively influenced on the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1384 · show in text ↑
e1

“The number of plants, tillers and dry matter of signalgrass was reduced with glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–933 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 96 and 144 g ha-1 applied at the 2 and 4 tiller stage reduced the growth of signalgrass.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
2 and 4 tiller stagee0
Treatment
Glyphosate at 96 and 144 g ha-1e0
Interactor
signalgrasse0weed
Outcome
growth of signalgrasse0
Direction
reducese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Herbicide-Resistant Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“Glyphosate at 96 and 144 g ha-1, when applied at 2 and 4 tiller stage, respectively, reduces the growth of signalgrass and does not affect the maize grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 96 and 144 g ha-1 did not affect the maize grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Glyphosate at 96 and 144 g ha-1e0
Outcome
maize grain yielde0
Direction
does not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Herbicide-Resistant Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“Glyphosate at 96 and 144 g ha-1, when applied at 2 and 4 tiller stage, respectively, reduces the growth of signalgrass and does not affect the maize grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1546 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

25 papers: 12 positive, 13 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

glyphosate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

77 papers: 42 positive, 35 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.