Paper · 1960 · Ikushugaku zasshi

Sexual affinity between the lines derived from the intersubspecific hybrid and the ecotypes of rice plant

T NAGAMATSU; T OMURA

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In a previous paper, the authors reported on the affinity between the lines derived from the intersubspecific hybrid of rice, Oryza sativa L., and their original parents. In short, most of these lines were thought to have returned to Japonica type parent, but some lines differed from their original parents and seemed to become a new type. To elucidate it more thoroughly, the authors produced the F1 hybrids between the 17 lines chosen at random from the progeny of the intersubspecific hybrid and the ecotypes of rice plant, Japanese rice, aus, aman, bulu, tjereh and boro, and investigated their seed fertilities. The results of the investigation lines were divided into two froups, “a” and “b”, according to sexual affinity between thses lines and the ecotypes. The lines of “a” group showed the highest affinity to Japanese rice, and moreover, the affinity to other ecotypes were similar to that between Japanese rice and other ecotypes. The authors considered form these results that the lines belonging to “a” group had returned to Japonica type parent. Three lines of “b” group were, on the other hand, thought to belong to intermediate tyoe grouped by morinaga, as they showed considerably high affinity to all ecotypes. They, however, differed from one another, and also differed from aus and bulu which were typical intermediate type. It gives us much interest in understanding the phylogenetic differentiation of cultivated rice varieties that the intermediate type was produced experimentally from Japonica-Indica hybrid.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid-derived rice lines separated into two sexual-affinity groups.

Outcome
two froups, “a” and “b”e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results of the investigation lines were divided into two froups, “a” and “b”, according to sexual affinity between thses lines and the ecotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–766 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Group a lines had greatest affinity with Japanese rice.

Material
“a” groupe0
Outcome
affinity to Japanese ricee0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lines of “a” group showed the highest affinity to Japanese rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–834 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Group a affinity with other ecotypes resembled Japanese rice affinity with those ecotypes.

Outcome
affinity to other ecotypese0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the affinity to other ecotypes were similar to that between Japanese rice and other ecotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–942 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors interpreted group a as having returned to the Japonica parent type.

Material
“a” groupe0
Outcome
returned to Japonica type parente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the lines belonging to “a” group had returned to Japonica type parent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1060 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three group b lines had high affinity to all rice ecotypes and were interpreted as intermediate type.

Material
“b” groupe0
Outcome
affinity to all ecotypese0
Direction
considerably highe0
Value
Three linese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Three lines of “b” group were, on the other hand, thought to belong to intermediate tyoe grouped by morinaga, as they showed considerably high affinity to all ecotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1230 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Group b lines differed from one another and from the intermediate types aus and bulu.

Outcome
differed from one another, and also differed from aus and bulue0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“They, however, differed from one another, and also differed from aus and bulu which were typical intermediate type.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1346 · show in text ↑